透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.158.178
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

推來拉去之間?從「推拉理論」分析臺灣人才流失與因應之道:以留美博士為例

Between "Push" and "Pull"?-An Analysis of Taiwan's "Brain Drain" and Possible Solutions from the Perspective of Push-Pull Theory: The Examples of Ph.D. Holders in the U.S.

摘要


在全球化影響下,各國為保競爭力,除重視高等教育人才培養,亦致力於爭搶他國人才,其中以博士人才為甚。在這場人才爭奪戰中,臺灣雖致力於培養博士人才,但也同時面臨「人才流失」的挑戰。據此,本研究主要目的在於先從「推拉理論」觀點,探究臺灣留學博士人才流失之推力、拉力與夾雜於其內之「個人因子」,再從中尋找突破契機。為達研究目的,本研究實際訪談14位留美任職博士。根據研究發現,臺灣端的「推力」因子,包括對臺灣高等教育環境劣勢條件的覺察(例如應聘過程繁文縟節、過度強調人脈、教授角色定位不明等);美國端的「拉力」因子,則是美國高等教育環境的相對優勢條件(例如應聘過程簡單快速、免除人情羈絆、教授角色定位明確等);另一組具影響力的「個人因子」,在於主觀認為臺灣各項攬才政策極具不穩定與欠缺完整規劃。最後,植基於研究結果,提出相關政策建議,包括設置「旋轉盤機制」、建立「聲聲喚人情鍊」以及「簡化應聘申請程序」,俾供相關政府單位參酌。

並列摘要


In response to the effects of globalization, to keep ahead of the competition countries worldwide strive to cultivate more talented people through higher education systems as well as by recruiting talent from other countries, particularly Ph.D. holders. The Taiwan government, which is no exception in this fight for talent, faces the challenge of "brain drain." This study, rooted in "Push-Pull Theory," first examined the possible "push," "pull," and personal factors that exacerbate the brain drain phenomenon in Taiwan (i.e., emigration of Ph.D. holders from Taiwan to other countries) and then provided some possible solutions. To this end, the study interviewed 14 Ph.D. holders who chose to stay in the United States after graduating. According to the current results, the "push" is related to the weakness of Taiwanese higher education (i.e., red tape during the recruitment process, the prevalence of nepotism, and the unclear roles of professors). By contrast, the "pull" of the United States are related to the strength of its higher education (i.e., the simplicity of the recruit mentprocess, the lack of nepotism, and the roles of professors being clearly defined). Furthermore, personal factors, particularly those involving policies that draw talented people overseas, include instability and lack of long-term plans. Based on the results, the end of the study offers some policy suggestions, including creating an "In-and-Out System," building a "Bonding System," and simplifying the application process.

參考文獻


Agarwal, V. B., & Winkler, D. R. (1985). Foreign demand for United States higher education: A study of developing countries in the eastern hemisphere. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(3), 623-644.
Ahmad, S. Z., & Hussain, M. (2017). An investigation of the factors determining student destination choice for higher education in the United Arab Emirates. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1324-1343.
Auriol, L. (2010). Careers of doctorate holders: Employment and mobility patterns (Working Paper No. 2010/04). OECD Publishing.
Bernard, A., Bell, M., & Charles-Edwards, E. (2014). Life-course transitions and the age profile of internal migration. Population and Development Review, 40(2), 213-239.
Bouwel, L. V., & Veugelers, R. (2014). Are foreign top PhD students more likely to stay in the United States? Some evidence from European economists. In M. Gerard & S. Uebelmesser (Eds.), The mobility of students and the highly skilled: Implications for education financing and economic policy (pp. 57-82). MIT Press.

被引用紀錄


李宜麟、楊思偉(2022)。大學人事與薪資管理制度改革之研究-以日本國立大學法人為例教育科學研究期刊67(2),213-242。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0008
紀茂嬌、賴怡樺、連雅慧(2022)。公教分途的實然與應然-以公立大學兼任行政職務教師校外兼職管理規範為焦點之問題建構教育科學研究期刊67(2),155-184。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0006
黃雁祥、紀茂嬌、林子斌(2022)。尊重與信任的體現:英國高教待遇之多重個案研究教育科學研究期刊67(2),63-93。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0003
黃家凱、林侑毅、陳慶智(2022)。國際高等教育競爭力分析:以新加坡與韓國大學教師待遇與兼職制度為例教育科學研究期刊67(2),33-61。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0002
劉秀曦、陳玉娟(2022)。留才攬才利器:美國大學教師薪資制度的特色及其對臺灣的啟示教育科學研究期刊67(2),1-31。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0001

延伸閱讀