宋祈對韓愈的接受－以重新、探源、校改為中心的討論

Song Qi's Reception of Han Yu: A Discussion Centered on the Value of Innovation, Source Tracing, and Literary Revision

謝佩芬(Pei-Fen Hsieh)

《師大學報：語言與文學類》 56卷1期 (2011/03) Pp. 83-113

摘要

韓愈文學史地位崇高，廣受宋人重視，相關論述亦多。學界成果豐碩，但於宋祁對韓愈之接受泰半偏重《新唐書‧韓愈傳》之比較研究，仍有續加探討空間。本文以重視創新、探求淵源、校改文章為中心，具體分析宋祁評說韓愈「新語」、「卓然不朽」、「古人意思未到」、「自名一家」之意涵與原由，並考辨新、舊《唐書》關於韓愈古文淵源史料，理解宋祁刪除梁肅資料用心，最後以宋祁校改韓愈作品例證，知曉改修情形、利弊得失，藉此掌握宋祁對韓愈接受之觀點與心態。

關鍵字

古文 ； 宋祁 ； 接受史 ； 新唐書 ； 韓愈

並列摘要

Han Yu holds a high status in literary history, receiving extensive attention from Song Dynasty historians, and arousing many relevant discourses. Involved academia has achieved fruitful results from studying Han Yu. However, Song Qi's reception of Han Yu mostly paid particular attention to the comparative study of ”Han Yu's Biography” in the ”New Book of Tang”, still leaving room for further investigation. This paper focuses on the value of innovation, source tracing, and literary revision, and concretely analyzes the meanings and reasons behind Song Qi's comments on Han Yu, such as ”new expressions”, ”eminent and immortal”, ”the ancients did not get the idea”, and ”create one's own characteristics”, and discerns the original historical materials regarding Han Yu in the ”New Book of Tang” and ”Old Book of Tang” to determine the intention of Song Qi's deletion of Liang Su's information. Ultimately, considering Song Qi's proofreading and correction of Han Yu's works as exemplary cases, this paper examines the revising circumstances, merits, and demerits to grasp Song Qi's receptive viewpoints and attitudes towards Han Yu.

並列關鍵字

Classical prose ； Song Qi ； reception history ； "New Book of Tang" ； Han Yu

參考文獻

漢司馬遷(2003)。史記。上海市:上海古籍出版社。

漢嚴可均校讎、陳延嘉校點主編、王同策校點主編、左振坤校點主編(1997)。全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文‧全漢文。石家莊市:河北教育出版社。

(1986)。景印文淵閣四庫全書。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。

清嚴可均輯(1999)。全晉文。北京市:商務印書館。

南朝宋范瞱(1997)。後漢書。北京市:中華書局。