透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.19.30.232
  • 期刊

大學自治下校規法律性質的探討:從在學關係談起

The Nature of Rules and Regulations Under University Autonomy: From the Aspect of Studentship

摘要


校規是用於規制大學的秩序,保障學術自由的促進及學習自由的工具。但在現行大學運行的實務下,似乎已然成為學校對學生的管制工具。校規的法律性質,在學說上均有相當多的討論及爭議,在於其法律性質有所變化的情形下,其內部拘束力會產生微妙的變化。在我國繼受外國法制下,有認為我國校規的法律性質應認定為公法性質,也有認為應為私法性質。然而,在適用外國法制前,必須先對我國實務現況下的法律關係,與大學的法律地位為認識,方可能為釐清。本文首先說明大學與大學生之間的關係與變化。其次以大學的在學關係的觀點切入大學校規的法律性質的討論。接著,著手討論公私立大學的法律地位,以點出公私立大學的異同,以便討論其校規的性質,隨後提出我國的學說爭議,再加以確立我國公私立大學的校規的法律性質。

並列摘要


School Regulation is a method of disciplining order of university, guaranteeing the freedom of academy and promoting freedom of studying. But in the practice of university, by now, school regulations seem to be university controlling instruments to indoctrinate university students. In terms of the character of school regulation, there are various discussions and debates on theory; furthermore, under the changing of legal character, its internal binding power will bring about subtle changes. Since our country inherits foreign legal system, some consider school regulation shall be recognized as bearing the character of public law, while others render it with the character of private law. However, before applying foreign legal system, we should know our country's legal relation under the situation of practice and the legal status of university at first so that such clarifying will be possible. First, this paper explains the relation and change between universities and university students. Second, from the aspect of university's relation with school, this article discusses the legal character of university regulation. Then this article will move on to discuss legal statuses of public and private university, and then point out the differences and similarities between public and private university. Finally, this paper enumerates the disputes on theory of our country to define the character of school regulation of our countries' public and private universities.

參考文獻


月旦法學教室編輯部(2006)。公立大學教師與學校之法律關係。月旦法學教室,45,101-102。
王金國(n.d.)。品格教育的實施策略與活動設計。2016年5月29日,擷取自http://group.hlc.edu.tw/file_upload/20121029-054326f2-333.pdf
江嘉琪(2010,9月)。行政契約與行政處分交錯適用之法律爭議。「2010年訴願暨法制學術研討會」發表之論文,高雄市政府法制局。
李仁淼( 2010 )。校規的法律性質(下)。臺灣法學雜誌,163,123-128。
李建良(1995)。遭留校察看的私校學生公權力之授與、學校與學生間之法律關係及其行政爭訟。月旦法學雜誌,6,50-52。

被引用紀錄


楊昌裕(2020)。開啟各級學校學生完整行政訴訟權新時代:大法官釋字第784號解釋學生事務與輔導58(4),81-86。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.202003_58(4).0008
蔡昕璋(2020)。2010年代臺灣學生事務的社會脈動與相關研究分析學生事務與輔導58(4),13-32。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.202003_58(4).0003

延伸閱讀