採用建造費用百分比法之服務費用合理性分析－由法令演進角度切入

ANALYSIS OF ARCHITECTUAL AND ENGINEERING FEES USING PERCENTAGE METHOD-FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF REGULATION EVOLUTION

鄭淵源(Yuan-Yuan Cheng) ； 王世旭(Shyh-Shiuh Wang) ； 李明聰(Ming-Tsung Lee) ； 翁紹偉(Shao-Wei Weng) ； 王維志(Wei-Chih Wang) ； 張書萍(Shu-Pin Chang) ； 張儀婷(I-Ting Chang) ； 林志錚(Chih-Cheng Lin) ； 周昌典(Chang-Tien Chou) ； 劉沈榮(Shen-Jung Liu)

《營建管理季刊》 90期 (2012/03) Pp. 1-16

https://doi.org/10.6505/CMJ-2012-90-1-16

摘要

技術服務相關法令自民國59 年施行以來，歷經40 幾年之演進，「建造費用百分比法」始終為最普遍被採用之計費方式，然其計費之合理性經常受到質疑，機關與技術服務廠商對於服務費用是否適當，常存在認知上的落差。本研究透過探討技術服務法令、服務費率及服務項目之演進，發現法令上服務費率的上限值雖直到99 年才真正調高，但因為營建物價上漲等因素，致使服務費用有調漲的效果，然由於薪資上漲以及「建造費用百分比法」所涵蓋服務項目數量的增加，使得服務費用有調降的效果。另，本研究亦初步發現有關服務費用合理性認知落差的主要原因，可能是歸因於機關透過議價以節省經費的作法、低價搶標、或發生變更設計或工期展延時卻未追加適當契約價金等因素，以致於造成實際服務費用與法定上限值之間有一段距離。最後，本研究認為技術服務法令雖已逐漸發展成熟，然服務費用之合理性確實仍有進一步討論與改善的空間。

關鍵字

技術服務法令 ； 計費方法 ； 服務費率 ； 成本項目

並列摘要

The regulations related to architectural/engineering (A/E) services had been implemented over 40 years in Taiwan. The method of the percentage of construction cost (or simply called ＂percentage method＂) is the most widely-used payment method for A/E fees (or consultant costs). However, the reasonableness of the values of the percentage has frequently been challenged. This study evaluates the reasonableness of the consultant costs calculated based on the percentage method by analyzing the evolution of the A/E regulations. This research finds that the regulatory ceiling of consultant fee has been increased because of the rise of construction cost index, even without increasing the values of percentage. However, the ceiling of A/E fees may be decreased due to the increase of personnel salaries and the increase of the amount of required service items. Additionally, this study indicates that a low A/E fee could be caused by an unreasonable fee-negotiation process, competition of a low bid, or no cost compensations granted during the occurrence of change orders/construction delays. Finally, several future research directions related to the evaluation of the reasonableness of A/E fees are suggested.

並列關鍵字

A/E regulations ； payment method ； percentage of construction cost ； service items