障礙（disability）與連帶（solidarity）的倫理學

Disability and the Christian Ethics of Solidarity

Gerald McKenny

《輔仁社會研究》 3期 (2013/01) Pp. 39-63

摘要

本論文考察了關於克服對「身具障礙」（those with）、「身無障礙」（those without）之間有問題的區別的倫理問題之三種模式。醫學模式（the Medical Model）誓言以醫療診斷與療癒克服區別，而社會模式（the Social Model）區分了缺損與障礙，並主張只有在特定的社會環境中缺損才會成為障礙。接續這些模式的批判估量之後連帶模式（the Solidarity Model）的接合與辯護，則打破了缺損之有無區別。此一模式的討論涉及了閏德斯（Hans Reinders）對善（the good）的討論、萬寧威瞿（Bernd Wannenwetsch）對作為人的狀態（personhood）的商榷，以及科瑞蔓（Deborah Creamer）與巴特（Karl Barth）對於限度的神學與倫理之重要性的議論。

關鍵字

障礙研究 ； 神學與障礙 ； 有限 ； 連帶

並列摘要

This paper considers three models of disability with regard to the ethical question of overcoming problematic distinctions between ”those with” and ”those without” disabilities. The Medical Model promises to overcome the distinction by medical diagnosis and cure, while the Social Model distinguishes between impairment and disability and argues that it is only within certain social environments that impairments become disabilities. Critical assessment of these models is followed by an articulation and defense of the Solidarity Model, which breaks down the distinction between those who are and are not impaired. The discussion of this model engages Hans Reinders' discussion of the good, Bernd Wannenwetsch's discussion of personhood, and Deborah Creamer's and Karl Barth's discussions of the theological and ethical significance of limits.

並列關鍵字

disability studies ； theology and disability ； finitude ； solidarity