The purpose of the CRPD is to end all discrimination against persons with disabilities, which means that States Parties have positive obligations to overcome structural, or systemic, discrimination. In Penal Judgment No. 574 (2014), the Kaohsiung Branch of the Taiwan High Court found the ex-national handball athlete, Jing-Kai Chen , guilty of faking blindness to claim an insurance payout. After the Judgment was published, investigation by the Control Yuan questioned its correctness and upheld Chen's innocence. However, this high-profile case aroused a conflict between judicial independence and judicial accountability. Analyzing the reasoning of the Judgement, this article concludes that harmful stereotypes contribute to structural, or systemic, discrimination against persons with Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI), and recommends judges and prosecutors to review the lessons of misjudgment in this case which violated positive obligations under the CRPD.