The impasse in global climate talks is entangled in corrective justice, distributive justice and intergenerational justice. The crux of this dispute has stemmed from the right-oriented argument. It gives rise to questions of who owns the entitlement of rights. One must adopt the duty-oriented argument to resolve a long-standing dilemma. It is beneficial to apply Kant's principle of the perfect and imperfect duties to harmonize the long-standing dilemma. From this point forward, the Greenhouse Development Rights framework by Paul Baer et al., which integrates responsibility and capability indicators, is one model that could be applied to solve the problems of distributive justice and intergenerational justice. Besides, the beneficiary pays principle can solve the problem of historical carbon emissions of developed countries indirectly. Application of all these principles can help provide some sort of way to meet the global climate justice challenge.