中等學校體育師資生「師資培育學程選擇動機量表」之修訂與信效度檢驗

Revision of motivation for choosing teacher education scale-preservice teachers specializing in physical education at the secondary level and its reliability and validity testing

鄧鈞文(Chun Wen Teng) ； 陳俊瑋(Chun Wei Chen)

《國立臺灣體育運動大學學報》 11卷1期 (2022/01) Pp. 1-26

https://doi.org/10.53106/2226535X2022011101001

摘要

目的：本研究藉由酌修張炳煌（2017）翻譯修訂之「中文版師資培育學程選擇動機量表」（Chinese version of the Motivation for Choosing Teacher Education Scale, C-FEMOLA）題項的用字遣詞，並酌減C-FEMOLA題項的數量，進一步將C-FEMOLA修訂成中等學校體育師資生「師資培育學程選擇動機量表」（Motivation for Choosing Teacher Education Scale-Preservice Teachers Specializing in Physical Education at the Secondary Level, MCTES-PTSPESL），並檢驗其信度與效度。方法：藉由國立臺灣體育運動大學126位體育師資生為研究對象，針對研究樣本透過問卷調查的方式蒐集相關資料，接著進行項目分析、試探性因素分析與驗證性因素分析，並計算Cronbach's α係數，以檢驗MCTES-PTSPESL的信度與效度。結果：在個別題項的適切性方面，項目分析發現，MCTES-PTSPESL個別題項的適切性佳，21個題項皆予以保留。在效度方面，試探性因素分析與驗證性因素分析皆發現，MCTES-PTSPESL包含「自我能力信念」、「任務難度較低」、「主修科目興趣」、「教育興趣」、「社會影響」、「經濟效用性」及「時間效用性」等七個分量表，具有良好的構念效度。在信度方面，七個分量表的α值介於.67至.90；總量表的α值為.87。結論：MCTES-PTSPESL具有良好的信度與效度，適合用來測量中等學校體育師資生師資培育學程選擇動機。

關鍵字

師資培育學程選擇動機 ； 心理計量特質 ； 驗證性因素分析

並列摘要

Objective: This study used the items of the Chinese version of the Motivation for Choosing Teacher Education Scale (C-FEMOLA) as the basis and reduced the number of items in C-FEMOLA from 30 to 21. The modified C-FEMOLA was subsequently revised into the Motivation for Choosing Teacher Education Scale-Preservice Teachers Specializing in Physical Education at the Secondary Level (MCTES-PTSPESL), reliability and validity of which were tested. Methods: The research participants consisted of 126 preservice teachers studying in National Taiwan University of Sport. This study used the questionnaire survey method to collect data. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted on the research sample. In addition, Cronbach's α coefficients were calculated to validate the reliability and validity of MCTES-PTSPESL. Results: Item analysis results revealed that the individual items of MCTES-PTSPESL exhibited high relevance and the 21 items were all preserved. The EFA and CFA results revealed that MCTES-PTSPESL contained 7 subscales, namely, ability beliefs, low task difficulty, subject-specific interest, educational interest, social influence, financial utility, and time compatibility utility, all of which exhibited favorable construct validity. The Cronbach's α values of the 7 subscales were between .67 and .90 and the Cronbach's α value of the scale was .87. Conclusion: MCTES-PTSPESL exhibited favorable reliability and validity and is suitable for measuring motivation for choosing teacher education programs among preservice teachers specializing in physical education at the secondary education level.

並列關鍵字

motivation for choosing teacher education ； psychometric characteristics ； confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)

參考文獻

Talsma, K., Robertson, K., Thomas, C., & Norris, K. (2021). COVID-19 beliefs, self efficacy and academic performance in first-year university students: Cohort comparison and mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology,http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643408

Wach, F.-S., Karbach, J., Ruffing, S., Brünken, R., & Spinath, F. M. (2016). University students’ satisfaction with their academic studies: Personality and motivation matter.Frontiers in Psychology, http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00055

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11, 131-151.