透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.104.29
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

都市河岸部落洪患風險認知與韌性:桃園市崁津部落的個案

URBAN RIVERSIDE TRIBES' FLOOD RISK PERCEPTION AND RESILIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF PAMATANGAN IN TAOYUAN CITY

摘要


當前臺灣的災害風險管理仍多以理性科學、量測數據與漢人思維為主流,但社會是動態且複雜的有機體,其與環境互動所產生的社會現象,應以具地方脈絡的觀點理解其過程,以風險溝通因應變動的環境與社會。本研究以桃園市大漢溪畔阿美族崁津部落為例,探討都市河岸部落對洪水的風險認知及其所演育的部落韌性。本研究以深度訪談法收集資料,研究發現都市河岸部落的風險認知乃源於文化為基底的社會特性。隨著時間推演及社會變動,崁津部落源於洪患風險認知而生的承洪韌性,從早期的能承受洪患的環境擾動,延伸成能承受都市河川治理政策的社會擾動之韌性。本研究建議公部門應以地方脈絡為基礎的進行雙向風險溝通,方為都市水治理之本。

並列摘要


Taiwan's current disaster risk reduction measures still follow scientific knowledge, measurements by instruments and mainstream thought developed by the Hans. The social system is a dynamic and complex organism. Its interaction with the environmental system creates innumerable social phenomena that governors need to draw from multiple perspectives and local contexts to appropriately deal with the changing environment and society. This study is on Dahan riverbank's Amis Pamatangan tribe in Taoyuan City and employs qualitative methods to understand the relationship between flood risk and resilience through the perspective of the local people's risk perception. Urban riverside tribe's flood risk perception originates from its sociocultural fabric. It is the root of flood resilience that makes the tribe co-exist with floods. This study suggests that the government must comprehend different cultural and social viewpoints. For perfect urban river planning and flood risk management, understanding various perspectives to facilitate two-way risk communication is the fundamental solution.

參考文獻


王誌男、林貝珊,2020,〈都市水岸社區的韌性與部落發展:桃園市撒烏瓦知的個案〉,《臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊》,10 卷 1 期:頁 135-164。doi:10.3966/222372402020101002004
陳永龍,2010,〈河岸邦查部落再生成與漂留族群生計重建〉,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,77 期:頁 135-175。doi:10.29816/TARQSS.201003.0004
楊智元、周桂田,2015,〈超越決定論的風險治理:替代性風險知識的產生〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,54 期:頁 109-156。doi:10.6523/168451532015090054003
劉晏汝、林貝珊,2021,〈異地重建原住民社區的社會資本樣貌與作用:以阿里山得恩亞納社區災後為例〉,《災害防救科技與管理學刊》,10 卷 1 期:頁 1-14。doi:10.6149/JDM.202103_10(1).0001
Besley, J. C., & Nisbet, M. 2013. How scientists view the public, the media and the political process, Public Understanding of Science, 22: 644-659. doi:10.1177/0963662511418743

延伸閱讀