透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.90.182
  • 期刊

中文晤談評量問卷(C-SEQ)內部結構之探討

A Study of Internal structure of the Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire (C-SEQ)

摘要


晤談評量問卷(Session Evaluation Questionnaire, SEQ)過去經常被作為評量諮商影響的用途,最新版本SEQ-5係由21對語意區分的相對形容詞組成,各題項採7點評分的方式計分。研究目的:本研究探討求助大學生在中文SEQ(C-SEQ)的反應情形,及C-SEQ的內部結構。研究方法:以2014年10月至2016年7月間,至台灣13所大學的諮商輔導中心,接受個別諮商的焦慮依附風格之學生為參與者,以N = 77探討C-SEQ的內部相關和內部一致性,及以參與者填答的第1次至第3次個別諮商之230份C-SEQ,探討C-SEQ諮商段落層次的因素結構。研究結果:以C-SEQ晤談評量向度和晤談後情感評量向度各10題,不含評量晤談整體感受的「差的-好的」題項,進行探索性和驗證性因素分析,可確認C-SEQ包含:深度性、順暢性、正向性和激動性的四個因素結構,以及此問卷的內部相關和內部一致性信度。研究結論:C-SEQ呈現四個因素的結構,這四個因素間存有中高度相關,且C-SEQ具有良好的信度。探索性因素分析與驗證性因素分析顯示,C-SEQ在晤談評量向度的信效度較晤談後情感評量向度理想。C-SEQ可作為國內心理師了解焦慮依附風格個案,接受個別諮商後在晤談感受的深度性、順暢性、正向性與激動性立即影響之諮商實務與研究用途。

並列摘要


The Session Evaluation Questionnaire(SEQ) has been applied to measure the impact of counseling sessions. The SEQ Form 5 (the most recent version) includes 21 items in a 7-point bipolar adjective format. The items are divided into two sections: session evaluation and postsession mood evaluation. The stem 'This session was' precedes the first 11 items(session evaluation). The stem 'Right now I feel' precedes the second 10 items (postsession mood evaluation). Objective: The purpose of this research attempted to explore the internal structure of the Chinese Session Evaluation(C-SEQ). Methods: The C-SEQ data were collected in a heterogeneous convenience sample of 95 participants with preoccupied attachment style at 13 universities in Taiwan, with each participant attending counseling session three times and completing three C-SEQ forms over the course of her/his first to third treatment(N= 285), and data collecting were from October, 2014 to July, 2016. Results: Both using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, including the dimension of session evaluation and the dimension of postsession mood evaluation in C-SEQ, not including "bad- good" items, in C-SEQ, the result could confirm C-SEQ including four factors, such as depth, smoothness, positivity, and arousal. The finding also showed the actual reaction of participants to C-SEQ. Conclusions: C-SEQ yields four factors. Intercorrelation of C-SEQ, measured by Pearson product-moment correlation has been medium to high, and reliability of C-SEQ has been high. C-SEQ is now available as an instrument for counseling process research and giving feedback for counseling practicum in Taiwan.

參考文獻


王慶福(1995)。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。
王慶福(2000)。當男孩遇上女孩︰人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係調適之研究。中華輔導學報。8,177-201。
王麗斐、林美珠(2000)。團體治療性因素量表之發展與編製。中華輔導學報。9,1-24。
江宛凌、陳慶福(2008)。以塔羅牌為諮商媒介所引發低自尊當事人之重要事件與晤談感受初探研究。中華輔導與諮商學報。24,107-145。
李偉斌、陳慶福、王智弘(2008)。網路即時諮商與晤談諮商中助人技巧、工作同盟與晤談感受之研究—以準諮商員為例。教育心理學報。40(1),1-22。

延伸閱讀