The purpose of this study was to compare kinetic differences related to explosive power in various training methods, and provide training recommendations for different competitions. The training methods are Slower Ramp Movements, Plyometric, and Instantaneous Change Speed training (ICS). In this study, 16 male sprinters and jumpers of the college team used the same weight training equipment and load to implement above 3 training methods. Age: 20.87±1.45; Height(cm): 177.49±3.52; Weight(kg): 73.16±8.5 Paired sample T-test was used to analyze the difference of kinetic parameters among the 3 methods. We collected data of concentric between 0 to 0.1 second. The parameters are Fmax, RFD, acceleration, velocity and power. Significant level was p<.01. Most of the parameters of ICS are significantly higher than other methods.
The purpose of this study was to compare kinetic differences related to explosive power in various training methods, and provide training recommendations for different competitions. The training methods are Slower Ramp Movements, Plyometric, and Instantaneous Change Speed training (ICS). In this study, 16 male sprinters and jumpers of the college team used the same weight training equipment and load to implement above 3 training methods. Age: 20.87±1.45; Height(cm): 177.49±3.52; Weight(kg): 73.16±8.5 Paired sample T-test was used to analyze the difference of kinetic parameters among the 3 methods. We collected data of concentric between 0 to 0.1 second. The parameters are Fmax, RFD, acceleration, velocity and power. Significant level was p<.01. Most of the parameters of ICS are significantly higher than other methods.