使用延伸嚇阻理論來解釋1950 年代兩次台海危機具有何種意義?美國藉由延伸嚇阻戰略(延伸嚇阻戰略以延伸嚇阻理論為根據),實施 3C :(能力 < 能實踐報復的壓倒性軍事力 > ,可信性 < 使敵方相信該國會實際行使報復行動 > ,溝通 < 政治家與外交官相互傳遞彼此要表達的訊息 > ),美國以防守國的姿態阻止中國發動攻擊以侵略美國的同盟國台灣的意圖,預防了中台戰爭的開打,使用延伸嚇阻理論來解釋1950 年代兩次的台海危機之意義即在此。美國使用「延伸嚇阻戰略(美國對中國使用核武器的威脅與美國擁有壓倒性軍事力的第七艦隊)」,能阻止中國侵略台灣。
What's the meaning of explaining two times of Taiwan Strait Crises in 1950s with extended deterrence theory? America has theoretical foundation of extended deterrence theory: 3C (capability < the military power that can practice retaliation > , credibility < to let other states believe you will really do the retaliation >, communication < conveying each others' intentions between politicians or diplomats > ). By using extended deterrence strategy, America deter China-attack country-from invading Taiwan, which is defense country-America's alliance, preventing the war between China and Taiwan. This is where the meaning of explaining two times of Taiwan Strait Crises in 1950s with extended deterrence theory is. America use extended deterrence theory (America's usage of nuclear weapons toward China and the possession of U.S. Seventh Fleet, which has overwhelming military power) to prevent China from invading Taiwan.