本研究同時以風浪板及高爾夫球兩種活動進行認真性休閒特質及休閒阻礙類型比較,藉由認真性休閒特質的明顯性來探討人們分別在從事風浪板及高爾夫活動時所面對的休閒阻礙。本研究目的:一、了解風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者的個人屬性;二、了解風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者的休閒狀況;三、探討風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者的認真性休閒特質並比較兩者之差異;四、探討風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者的休閒阻礙並比較兩者之差異。以立意抽樣取得風浪板參與者有效樣本 210份;高爾夫認真性休閒者有效樣本143份。研究結果發現:一、風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者具特定的人口屬性分佈,如參與者之性別、年齡、婚姻狀況、職業呈現不同的分佈。二、風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者的休閒狀況不同,參與者從事該活動時,同行人數、從事活動的頻率、接觸活動的時問及每月投資的配備較具差異。三、風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者均以「持久利益」認真性休閒特質最爲明顯;風浪板認真性休閒者在「持久利益」、「個人努力」及「次文化」特質的呈現上較高爾夫球認真性休閒者明顯。四、「結構性阻礙」是風浪板及高爾夫認真性休閒者所面臨的主要休閒阻礙;「人際問阻礙」則是感受較弱的阻礙類型。
The purpose of this study focus on comparing characteristics of serious leisure with types of leisure constraints in windsurfing and golf activity, and discussing the leisure constraints what people faced when participating windsurfing and golf activity. There are three objectives in the study. First of all, to understand windsurfing and golf participants’ personal attributes. Secondly, to understand windsurfing and golf participants’ leisure statuses. Thirdly, to probe into windsurfing and golf participants’ attributes of serious leisure and compare the differences. Lastly, to probe into windsurfing and golf participants’ types of leisure constraints and compare the differences. By Purposive sampling, this study collects 210 effective samples from windsurfing participants and 143 from golf participants. The major conclusions are as follows: 1. Windsurfing and golf participants show different distributions of sex, age, marriage status and career. 2. Windsurfing and golf participants have different leisure statuses, the company, the frequency of doing activity, how long they started doing activity, and how much they in equipment in equipment monthly are different. 3. Besides, participants are shown most agreement in ”long-lasting benefits” among all features of serious leisure windsurfing participants have more agreement on ”long-lasting benefits”, ”personal effort” and ”subculture” than golf participants have. 4. Structural constraints are the major leisure constraint with both windsurfing and golf participants faced while interpersonal constraints are the weakest constraint type.