- 期刊
Amendments to Patent Examination Guidelines on Inventive Step Assessment: A More Refined Approach to Determining Whether ＂Motivation to Combine Multiple References＂ Exists
延伸閱讀
- Wang, D. (2010). Amendment to Patent Examination Guidelines. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2010(11), 11-12. https://doi.org/10.29492/LLB.201011.0026
- Wang, D. (2010). Amendment to Patent Examination Guidelines. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2010(6), 11-12. https://doi.org/10.29492/LLB.201011.0010
- Chen, M. (2016). Can a Patent Invalidation Petitioner Agree with a TIPO Decision Upholding Patent Validity but File Administrative Suit Requesting the Court to Review New Evidence/New Arguments against Patent Validity. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2016(7), 8-11. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110420002-201607-201608030012-201608030012-8-11
- Wang, D. (2004). Invention Patent Examination Guidelines under Amendment. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2004(1), 18-18-1. https://doi.org/10.29492/LLB.200401.0023
- Chien, H. R., & Chen, M. (2014). With Respect to the Same Prior Art Reference(s), Can the Patent Office Reach a Different Conclusion in a Patent Cancellation Procedure from the Conclusion Given when it Granted the Patent?. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2014(7), 29-31. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110420002-201407-201408110013-201408110013-29-31