- 期刊
The Supreme Administrative Court Ruled Again on Whether Invalidation Petitioner as Intervener Can Submit New Evidence in Administrative Lawsuit
延伸閱讀
- Chien, H. R., & Wu, S. I. (2016). Supreme Administrative Court: Courts Can Discover the Secondary Evidence Not Provided by Invalidation Petitioners on Their Authority. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2016(3), 14-16. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110420002-201603-201604060025-201604060025-14-16
- 林明昕（2009）。Reexamination of the Applicable Scope and Function of the Device of Ordering an Interested Person to Intervene under Article 41 of Administrative Litigation Act。臺大法學論叢，38(3)，73-108。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2009.38.03.02
- 林柏霖（2014）。The Subject Matter of the Burden of Proof and Obligation of Cooperation in the Deduction for Export Commission─Focusing on the Judgments of Administrative Court〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.01747
- 許登科（2011）。The Legal Status of Private Institution under the Law for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects-Comments on the Criminal Decisions of the Supreme Court。中正大學法學集刊，(33)，79-143。https://doi.org/10.30094/NCCULJ.201104.0002
- Tsai, R. S. (2004). New Evidence Inadmissible in Appeals to Supreme Administrative Court. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2004(3), 4-4-3. https://doi.org/10.29492/LLB.200405.0006