露營活動參與者遊憩行為之調查研究－以台北市為例

The Investigate among Recreational Behavior of Campers-A Case Study of Taipei City Area

陳偉瑀(Wei-Yu Chen) ； 陳安妮(Annie-Chen)

《休閒觀光與運動健康學報》 5卷2期 (2015/03) Pp. 54-70

摘要

在眾多戶外冒險體驗遊憩行為中，露營是一種頗為特殊的休閒遊憩方式。但回顧近年來的觀光休閒研究期刊論著，鮮少有對露營活動有較深入的探討研究。然露營遊憩活動本身就是一種對環境不確定與自然為伍的冒險體驗過程。本研究根據Robinson（1992）冒險遊憩模式為基礎建構研究變項，包括參與動機、流暢體驗、參與結果評估，及正面感受影響等四個變項，來調查露營參與者與個人背景變項之關係。採問卷調查方式，以台北市露營場之遊客為研究對象，於週休假日取樣進行調查。統計方法係以描述性統計、t考驗及單因子變異數分析。研究結果發現：1.男性比女性有較佳的流暢體驗及參與結果評估。2.已婚比未婚有較佳的流暢體驗及參與結果評估。3.21~30、41~50歲比15~20歲族群的露營參與者有較佳的流暢體驗；4.教育程度對露營參與者在冒險遊憩行為上無任何差異。5.在職業類別上，流暢體驗與參與結果評估有差異存在。6.經濟收入達6萬以上的族群比其他露營參與者有較佳的流暢體驗；6萬以上、4-6萬的族群比無收入者有較佳的參與結果評估。7.5-6次以上比僅參與1次的露營參與者有較佳的流暢體驗；6次以上的族群有較佳的參與結果評估與正面影響。

關鍵字

參與動機 ； 流暢體驗 ； 參與結果評估 ； 正面感受

並列摘要

Among the outdoor adventures recreation behavior camping is a rather special way of recreation. Reviewing the literature of tourism and leisure studies in recent years little research has been alone on camping recreations invitees. However, camping recreation activities on the environment itself is an uncertain adventure experience associating with the natural process. In this study, according to Robinson (1992) model based on adventure recreation ,we discussing the relationship between participant' background variables and motivation, flow experience, evaluation of results, and the positive feelings affect to investigate the camp participants. Questionnaires were given to Taipei campground for the study, in the weekly rest holiday sampling investigation. Statistical methods based on descriptive statistics, t-test and ANOVA analysis. The results showed that: first, male have better flow experience and participation in evaluation of results than women. Second, there is a better flow experience and participation in evaluation of results in married than unmarried. third, the group aged 21 to 30 and 41 to 50 years old in a better camping smooth experience than age 15 to 20 participants. fourth, levels of education on the camping adventure recreation participants without any difference in behavior . Fifth, the military and government services than the manufacturing sector, student groups have better flow experience; Meanwhile, military and government services are better than the results of participation evaluation. Sixth, the economic income of more than NT$60,000 population than any other participants have better flow experience NT$60,000 and 4-60000 better than no income involved evaluation of results. Seventh participants with above 5 times camping experiences have better flow experiences than only once, the participants with above 6 times camping experiences have better evaluation of results and positive impact.

並列關鍵字

participative motivation ； flow experience ； results of participation evaluation ； perceived positive influences