透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.185.194
  • 期刊

連續性與分段性阻力運動對生理反應之影響

The Effect of Physiological Responses during Continuous and Split Resistance Training

摘要


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare physiological responses during continuous and split resistance training. Methods: This study had 22 male subjects. The mean age of subjects was 22.7±1.9 years. During the resistance training, the oxygen consumption, heart rate, body temperature, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) will be measured. All subjects performed a 1RM test on eight resistance exercises and participated in continuous resistance training (two circles per time, 24 minutes) and split resistance training (one circle per time and repeated two times, 2*12 minutes). Paired t-test was used to compare the differences between continuous and split resistance training. Results: There were significant differences between two groups in heart rate, body temperature, and RPE (p>.05), but there were no significant differences between two groups in oxygen consumption, and energy expenditure. (p>.05) Conclusions: With the same duration and intensity, continuous and split type exercise program have the same oxygen consumption. Continuous resistance training has greater effects than split resistance training in other physiological responses, so split resistance training was completed easier than continuous resistance training. To sum up, people in the initial exercise stage can choose split exercise type, they will get used to the energy expenditure and participate the activity continuously.

關鍵字

運動模式 耗氧量 心跳率 體溫

並列摘要


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare physiological responses during continuous and split resistance training. Methods: This study had 22 male subjects. The mean age of subjects was 22.7±1.9 years. During the resistance training, the oxygen consumption, heart rate, body temperature, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) will be measured. All subjects performed a 1RM test on eight resistance exercises and participated in continuous resistance training (two circles per time, 24 minutes) and split resistance training (one circle per time and repeated two times, 2*12 minutes). Paired t-test was used to compare the differences between continuous and split resistance training. Results: There were significant differences between two groups in heart rate, body temperature, and RPE (p>.05), but there were no significant differences between two groups in oxygen consumption, and energy expenditure. (p>.05) Conclusions: With the same duration and intensity, continuous and split type exercise program have the same oxygen consumption. Continuous resistance training has greater effects than split resistance training in other physiological responses, so split resistance training was completed easier than continuous resistance training. To sum up, people in the initial exercise stage can choose split exercise type, they will get used to the energy expenditure and participate the activity continuously.

延伸閱讀