承攬運送契約爭議問題之探討

Some Controversies in Contracts of Freight Forwarding

林一山(I-shan Lin)

《臺灣海洋法學報》 1卷1期 (2002/06) Pp. 175-190

https://doi.org/10.29881/TLSR.200206.0004

摘要

承攬運送人與委託人訂立承攬運送契約，再與一運送人訂立運送契約，運送委託人交付之貨物，因此運送人、承攬運送人、委託人形成一三面關係，而牽涉到所謂第三人損害賠償的問題。其間牽涉到數個專屬於此領域之重大爭議問題，特別是在承攬運送人的義務與權利方面，前者即承攬運送人是否有義務擔保運送之完全履行，後者即承攬運送人之報酬請求權，均存在著根本上之爭議，特為文介紹之。

關鍵字

承攬運送契約 ； 承攬運送人 ； 第三人損害賠償 ； 承攬運送人之擔保義務

並列摘要

In practice, forwarders first make forwarding contracts with their customers and then carriage contracts with carriers before transportation is started. Thus forwarders, customers, and carriers are in a triangular situation and the legal problems among them are very complicated. The German forwarding business rule has been amended on July 1st, 1998. In this article, the author discussed by way of comparison, some points of the relevant controversies, especially about the legal rights and duties of forwarders: Do forwarders have to be fully duty-bound to guarantee the whole fulfillment of transportation? Could shippers arise legal claims against forwarders?

並列關鍵字

Contracts of Freight Forwarding ； Forwarder ； Duty of Guaranty

參考文獻

史尚寬(1981)。債法各論。

邱聰智(1995)。輔仁大學法學叢書（四）。

梅仲協(1963)。民法要義。

薛祀光(1960)。民法債編各論。三民書局。

戴修瓚(1964)。民法債編各論（下）。三民書局。