我國事業單位虧損或業務緊縮致終止勞動契約之研究

The Research of a Deficit or Downsizing in Business Results of Termination in Labor Contract in Taiwan

李文良(Wen-Liang Lee)

《臺灣海洋法學報》 6卷2期 (2007/12) Pp. 228-265

https://doi.org/10.29881/TLSR.200712.0006

摘要

勞動基準法第十一條二款，“虧損”、“業務緊縮”，係雇主作為終止勞動契約之理由，不但造成勞工各人經濟陷入困頓及社會不安，因此，有大量解僱勞工保護法之制定，驅使行政機關介入此類“經濟性解僱”，以圖達到保護勞工及安定社會經濟之作用。惟“虧損”、“業務緊縮”係“不確定法律概念”，尤其虧損又是“企業經營權”的核心問題，企業往往因虧損必需採取自救措施，輕者人事調整，嚴重者可能歇業甚至“關廠”，而造成大量勞工失業，所以虧損是值得研究的議題。

關鍵字

虧損 ； 業務緊縮 ； 大量解僱 ； 企業經營權 ； 不確定法律概念 ； 經濟性解僱 ； 關廠

並列摘要

According to the Labor Standards of Law, section 2, article 11, ”A deficit or a downsizing” is the reason for employers to terminate the labor contracts. These dislocated workers have suffered from financial hardship and sociological insecurity. In order to have the government or authorities to be involved with this issue, a labor protection law was created to be more fair in a lay off of workers, to protect workers and maintain the peace and economic stability in the society. With ”a deficit or a downsizing”, it is uncertainty of law, especially because a deficit is the main concern of managerial prerogatives. With a deficit, businesses typically use self-preservation; the least of which results in the reorganization of the employees, and the most severe results would be the plant closure where workers would lose their jobs. It can be concluded that a deficit is definitely worth researching further.

並列關鍵字

deficit ； downsizing ； massive lay-off ； managerial prerogatives ； uncertainty of Law ； economic lay-off ； plant closures

參考文獻

李任初(1992)。新自由主義。台北:台灣商務印書館。

西川潤、吳樹文譯(1992)。世界經濟入門。台北:台灣商務印書館。

林立(2002)。法學方法論與德沃金。台北:學林文化事業有限公司。

林文雄(2000)。法實證主義。台北:東陞美術印刷有限公司。

黃建輝(1988)。法律漏洞，類推適用。台北:蔚理法律出版社。