海商法判決實證量化分析

Empirical and Quantum Analysis of Judicial Maritime Cases in Taiwan

饒瑞正(Juei-Cheng Jao)

《臺灣海洋法學報》 10卷2期 (2012/12) Pp. 1-34

https://doi.org/10.29881/TLSR.201212.0001

摘要

本文調查1999年至2010年我國海商法判決，以為統計分析。客觀呈現並確認海商法各次領域，依案件數量與爭議類型，所彰顯的重要性，期為海商法學的研究資源、教育資源暨立法資源分配之參考依據。所統計年度的案件總數計461件，其中8%為法律爭議案件，68%為事實爭議和法律爭議併存案件，亦即76%係為解決海商法上爭議問題。第三審案件計39件，占總案件數的8.5%，顯示當事人間的歧異多數於第一、二審為法院所說服，惟最終不信服度仍達8.5%。海商爭議議題區分的統計結果，海上運送法案件占55%，海事法占23%，海商法適用範圍占13%，海上保險法占8%，共同海損占1%。文末並針對實證結果提出我國海商法熱門議題，以為立法與司法層面、研究與教學層面和國家考試層面之建議。

關鍵字

海商案件判決 ； 實證法學研究 ； 實證研究 ； 量化分析

並列摘要

This paper investigates maritime law cases in the courts of Taiwan from 1999 to 2010 by empirical legal research method enabling to find out variety of legal issues for the purpose of being objectively important reference for the distribution of research, teaching and law-making sources. The statistic shows there are total 461 cases, 8% of which are connected with legal issues and 68% are hybrid nature with fact and legal issues, that is, 76% are to resolve the legal problems in the maritime code. The quantity of final trial cases are 39 being 8.5% of the total cases. It indicates that contradiction between the parties is well settled in the first and second trial, yet a high percentage of 8.5% of the parties are not convinced in the first and second trials. The statistic also shows 55% are carriage cases, 23% maritime law, 13% scope of application, 8% marine insurance and 1% general average. It is submitted in the conclusion the hot native issues within maritime law for the reference in the aspects of legal research, legal teaching and law-making.

並列關鍵字

Maritime Cases ； Empirical Legal Research ； Empirical Research ； Quantum Analysis

參考文獻

行政院海洋事務推動委員會編(1996)。海洋政策白皮書。行政院研究發展考核委員會。

王安異(2007)。往返實證主義與自然法之間─貝林刑法思想研究。臺北大學法學論叢。1-40。

林雍昇(2009)。從德國法論公務員刑事責任之法學實證分析。臺灣法學雜誌。74-92。

邱文聰(2008)。被忽略的（立法）事實：探詢實證科學在規範論證中的可能角色兼評釋字第584號解釋。國立臺灣大學法學論叢。233-284。

黃國昌(2009)。法學實證研究方法初探。月旦法學。142-153。