進口米與國產米之比較

Comparison between Imported and Domestic Rice

洪梅珠(Mei-Chu Hong)

《臺中區農業改良場特刊》 60號 (2003/06) Pp. 39-48

https://doi.org/10.29563/ZHWHGX.200306.0030

摘要

於91年5月及9月上旬在市面上購買進口米與國產米，並進行品質分析，比較其間之差異，以供消費者買米及各界參考用。結果發現以日本魚沼越光米及新潟越光米最貴（約250元／kg），其價格為國產越光米的3倍，為國產CAS良質米臺稉9號的5倍，美國加州米及泰國香米的價格在5月份與國產CAS良質米臺稉9號相近，9月份則比國產CAS良質米臺稉9號便宜。泰國香米及澳洲香米屬長粒細長形米，美國加州米及國產臺中秈10號屬中粒中間形米，其餘均屬短粒粗圓形米。5月份白米液pH值以泰國香米最低，9月份則以日本越光米最低，國產米較高。5月份的米飯食味以日本越光米最佳，泰國香米最差。9月份的米飯食味則以國產CAS良質米臺稉9號及池上越光米最佳，美國加州米、澳洲米及泰國香米較差。

關鍵字

進口米 ； 國產米 ； 米質

並列摘要

The imported and domestic rice were sampled from supermarket to investigate the variation of rice quality in early of May and September 2002. The information can be useful to consumers in buying high quality milled rice. The results showed that the price of Niigata Koshihikari and Uonuma Koshihikari is the most expensive, which is about 250 NT/kg. The price was three and five times to domestic Koshihikari and CAS Taikeng 9, respectively. The price of California rice and Thailand aroma rice is similar to domestic rice of CAS Taikeng 9 in May 2002, but it was cheaper in September 2002.Thailand aroma rice and Australia aroma rice are long grain type and slender in shape, California rice and domestic rice of Taichung sen 10 are medium grain type and intermediate in shape, other samples belong to short grain type and round in shape. The pH value of Thailand aroma rice was the lowest among all tested samples in May 2002. However, in September 2002, Niigata Koshihikari and Uonuma Koshihikari had the lowest pH value and domestic rice had the highest pH value. In May 2002, Niigata Koshihikari and Uonuwa Koshihikari showed better palatability, the Thailand aroma rice was the worst in contrast. However, in September 2002, domestic rice of CAS Taikeng 9 and Koshihikari production from Taitung County showed better palatability, the California rice, Australia rice and Thailand aroma rice were the worst.

並列關鍵字

imported rice ； domestic rice ； rice quality