透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.46.249
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

立體視覺化工具融入國小表面積教學之研究:以Google SketchUp為例

Integrating 3D Visualization Tools into Teaching Surface Area in Elementary School Classrooms: An Example of Google SketchUp

摘要


本研究旨在探討接受「Google SketchUp輔助教學(使用推拉功能與不使用推拉功能)」與「傳統講述教學」三種教學模式,對學生複合形體表面積學習成效之影響。本研究採用不等組前後測設計的實驗研究法進行教學實驗,實驗對象為臺南市某國小五年級三個班級共84名學生,以班級為單位,隨機分成三組。經由三週實驗教學後,實施複合形體表面積成就測驗後測。研究結果發現,「Google SketchUp輔助教學具推拉功能模式」的學習成效優於「Google SketchUp輔助教學不具推拉功能模式」及傳統講述教學模式,但「Google SketchUp輔助教學不具推拉功能模式」和傳統講述教學模式在學習成效上無顯著差異。由本實驗的結果可得知,當教師將資訊科技融入數學教學時,假使資訊科技的影響力不足,其衍生的學習效果與傳統教學無異。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of three teaching models on the effectiveness of learning the surface area of composite solids in elementary school settings: the Google SketchUp assisted instructional model with push-and-pull function, the Google SketchUp assisted instructional model without push-and-pull function, and the traditional instructional model. This is an empirical study, utilizing a nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design. Participants were recruited from an elementary school in Tainan city, including three classes with a total of 84 fifth-graders. Each class was randomly assigned one of the three teaching models. After a three-week teaching experiment, all the participants completed a posttest on the surface area of composite solids. The results showed that students who received the ”Google SketchUp assisted instructional model with push-and-pull function” performed better than students who received the ”Google SketchUp assisted instructional model without push-and-pull function” and students who received the ”traditional instructional model”. However, no significant difference was found in learning effectiveness between the ”Google SketchUp assisted instructional model without push-and-pull function” and the ”traditional instructional model”. The findings indicated that integrating information technology into mathematics education would only be effective when the tools are comprehensively implemented; otherwise, it would not significantly differ from the result of employing traditional classroom teaching strategies.

參考文獻


Baki, A., Kosa, T., & Guven, B. (2011). A comparative study of the effects of using dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on the spatial visualization skills of pre-service mathematics teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 291-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01012.x
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognitive and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
Chen, C. (2002). Information visualization. Information Visualization, 1, 1-4. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500009
Liang, H. N., & Sedig, K. (2010). Can interactive visualization tools engage and support pre-university students in exploring non-trivial mathematical concepts? Computers & Education, 54(4), 972-991. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.001
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. doi: 10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

延伸閱讀