透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.14.84.90
  • 期刊

水肺潛水自覺專業能力、知覺風險與自發性行為量表探索性因素分析與驗證性分析編製比較

The Comparison of Scuba Diving Conscious Professional Competency, Perceived Risk and Voluntary Behavior Scales were Prepared by Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

摘要


本研究目的擬以探索性因素分析編製休閒潛水自覺專業能力、知覺風險與自發性行為等三個量表,並進一步以驗證性因素分析加以驗證比較。以74位具有國際水肺潛水證照的墾丁參與休閒潛水者為對象,經採SPSS統計分析套裝軟體與AMOS 17.0統計分析軟體處理後發現:1.經採項目分析與探索性因素分析處理後,休閒潛水「自覺專業能力量表」共萃取了「傷害與急救」「專業知識」「操作技能」「專業態度」與「專業技能」等五個構面,「知覺風險量表」共萃取了「滿意度風險」「心理風險」「財務風險」「裝備風險」「傷害風險」等五個構面,「自發性行為量表」共萃取了「忠誠度行為」、「合作行為」與「參與行為」等三個構面;三個量表具有相當高的信度與效度。2.經採驗證性因素分析檢驗之後,發現在增量適配度方面,水肺潛水「自覺專業能力」、「知覺風險」與「自發性行為」等三個正式量表的增量適配度並未符合標準。在簡約適配度方面,水肺潛水「知覺風險」與「自發性行為」兩個量表大致上相當簡約。而「專業能力」量表的簡約性稍嫌不是;休閒潛水「專業能力」與「知覺風險」與「自發性行為」三個量表的十三個潛在變項均具有不錯的組合信度,然而其收斂效度卻均不佳。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to prepare the recreational diving conscious professional competency, perceived risk and voluntary behavior scales by exploratory factor analysis. And further the confirmatory factor analysis was to be verified and compared. The sample of the study mainly consisted of 74 recreational divers in Kenting who had a international scuba diving license, in addition, SPSS20.0 and AMOS 17.0 were adopted in this study. The findings were concluded as the following: 1. By the processing of project analysis and exploratory factor analysis, the recreational diving conscious professional competency scale was extracted from the five dimensions-injury and emergency, professional knowledge, operational skills, professional attitude, and professional skills. The perceived risk scale was extracted from the five dimensions-satisfaction risk, psychological risk, financial risk, equip risk and risk of injury. The voluntary behavior scale was ex acted from the three dimensions-loyalty behavior, cooperative behavior and participation behavior. Three scales have very high reliability and validity. 2. By the processing of confirmatory factor analysis, finding the incremental adaptation of the scuba diving conscious professional competency, perceived risk and voluntary behavior scales did not comply with a standard. The simple adaptation of the scuba diving perceived risk and voluntary behavior scales were generally quite simple but professional competency scale was not enough. The thirteen potential variables of recreational diving conscious professional competency, perceived risk and voluntary behavior scales all had a good combination of reliability however, its convergent validity was not good.

延伸閱讀