透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.131.178
  • 期刊

測定井水和河水中鉛、鎘和坤的方法之研究

A Study on the Methods for the Determination of Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic in Well Water and River Water

摘要


本篇以石墨電熱式原子吸光法(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry)和汞滴差波剝除伏安法(Differential Pulse Anodic or Cathodic Stripping Voltammetry at Hanging Mercury Drop Electrode)測定井水和河川水樣中的鉛、鎘和砷。除了用剝除伏安法測砷時,需要前處理,使As(V)還原爲As(II)外,其餘都可直接測得。此兩種方法所得的結果都很靠近(相差在1 ppb以內),但精密度(Precision)則以石墨式原子吸光法的較好些。它們的線性範圍和偵測極限(Detection Limit)也都很相近。在測鉛、鎘、砷時,石墨式原子吸光法可分別測到0.68 ppb, 0.031 ppb,1.39 ppb;剝除伏安法則可分別測到0.50ppb, 0.30ppb, 0.99ppb。剝除伏安法的優點是可同時測得鉛和鎘,每次約需七分鐘,而石墨式原子吸光法每次只能測一種元素,但只需二分鐘。石墨式原子吸光法的優點是每次水樣只需用20 μL,而剝除伏安法則需9 mL。在測砷時,以石墨式原子吸光法較方便,因不需前處理的步驟。

關鍵字

無資料

並列摘要


Two methods, GF-AAS (Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry) and DP-ASV or DP-CSV (Differential Pulse Anodic or Cathodic Stripping Voltammetry at Hanging Mercury Drop Electrode). were studied to determine Pb, Cd, and As in a well water and some river water. Water samples which contain low-ppb ranges of Pb, Cd, and As could be determined directly by GF-AAS and DP-ASV without any pre-treatment or pre-concentration except for the determination of As by use of DP-CSV. The results obtained by use of GF-AAS and DP-ASV are comparable (within 1 ppb) but GF-AAS has a better precision than that of DP-ASV or DP-CSV. The ranges of linearity by GF-AAS and DP-ASV or DP-CSV are also comparable. The detection limits for Pb, Cd, and As are 0.68 ppb, 0.031 ppb, and 1.39 ppb, respectively , by use of GF-AAS and are 0.50 ppb, 0. 30 ppb, and 0.99 ppb, respectively, by use of DP-ASV and DP-CSV. Thu advantage for DP-ASV is that both Pb and Cd can be determined simultaneously in one run although it took about 7 minutes, while GF-AAS can determine only one element at a time and took about 2 minutes. The advantage for GF-AAS is that only 20 L of sample volume is used while DP-ASV and DP-CSV need 9 mL. For the determination of As, GF-AAS is simpler because the pre-treatment is not necessary.

並列關鍵字

無資料

延伸閱讀