透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.15.63.145
  • 期刊

大學教師教學評鑑-一所私立科技大學的實踐之反思與探究

Teaching Evaluation of University Teachers--An Introspective Study of Practice at a Private University of Science and Technology

摘要


依大學法規定,大學必須針對教師的教學進行評鑑,以做為獎勵以及停聘或不續聘之參考依據。因此,大學的教學評鑑制度是否完善、適當與可行,是一項值得探究之問題。有鑑於此,研究者以本身所任職大學之教學評鑑制度為研究對象,針對教學評鑑的項目、指標及其配分等事項進行探究。為使探究結果儘量符合學校發展與教師需求以及合理與可行之要求,研究者除參照相關文獻,還訪談本校教學評鑑業管單位主管及探詢校內教師之意見。最後,研究者針對本校教學評鑑制度改善方向提出建議,且具體提出兩種類型不同之評鑑方案。本文的探究歷程與結果不但可做為本校改善教學評鑑制度之基礎,還可供其他大學校院參考。

並列摘要


According to the University Act regulations, universities must evaluate teachers’ teaching so as to provide a reference for reward, temporary termination of contract, or discontinuation of contract. Given this, fundamental questions about the systems of teaching evaluation’s appropriateness and feasibility are issues worth investigating. The researcher examined a sample school’s teaching evaluation system, exploring the teaching evaluation’s items, indicators, and scores. In order to align research results with the needs of school and teacher development, as well as including a rational and feasible base, the researcher referenced relevant literature and interviewed the director of the unit in charge of teaching evaluations. Teachers inside the school were also asked for opinions. Finally, the researcher suggests directions for improvement of the school’s evaluation system, proposing two different types of evaluation approaches. Results can form the basis of improving this school’s teaching evaluation system and provide a reference to departments and colleges of other universities.

參考文獻


丁一顧、張德銳(2004)。美英兩國教師評鑑系統比較分析及其對我國之啟示。台北市立師範學院學報,35(2),85-100。
王振世、陳芃婷(2005)。大學教師績效評量模型之建立:以新竹某國立大學為例。科技管理學刊,10(3),121-152。
王國明、顧志遠(1994)。績效獎勵制度建立之理論與實務――以元智工學院教師績效獎勵制度為例。研考雙月刊,18(5),32-41。
吳宇正(2002)。大學教師績效評估模式之研究—應用DHP法。中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
吳佩真、張民杰(2007)。國內大學教師教學評鑑現況分析。評鑑,9,9-15。

被引用紀錄


黃子嫣(2012)。我國大學校院教學評鑑制度之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.00857

延伸閱讀