- 期刊
理性與信仰－談德爾圖良的悖論
Reason and Faith: An Analysis of Tertullian's Paradox
並列摘要
Tertullian has been categorised as a fideist for a long time because of his famous motto ＂Credo quim absurdum＂. The phrase contradicts logic and empirical knowledge and is regarded as a paradox. It seems that the phrase implies the conflict between reason and faith. Tertullian's attitude towards the relationship between reason and faith has been the focus of many academic fields. This article gives a brief review on several research approaches to Tertullian, such as psychological analysis, philosophical analysis, theology and theosophy. After that, the author returns to the text of Tertullian and make an analysis of it. This article concludes with some comments on the relation between reason and faith.
延伸閱讀
- 罗伯．法森、龙艳（2004）。阿尔伯特．德布拉尔论神学与灵性的背离。基督教文化學刊，(12)，43-69。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20181217001-200412-202204130015-202204130015-43-69
- 白若萌（2019）。人神之界－理性與信仰關係視域下安薩里與康德的宗教哲學比較。宗教哲學，(88)，117-129。https://doi.org/10.6309/JORP.201906_(88).0005
- 李仲驥（2012）。徘徊於理解與相信之間－從帕斯卡爾看理性的規限與信仰的原諉。建道學刊，(37)，29-53。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20220215001-201201-202203150014-202203150014-29-53
- 林鴻信（1995）。Meaning of Theodicy in Cause and Reason。台灣神學論刊，(17)，37-54。https://doi.org/10.29756/TJT.199503.0003
- 蘇永明（2021）。On R. S. Peters' ＂reason and habit: the paradox of moral education ＂: retrospection and criticism。臺灣教育哲學，5(2)，1-19。https://doi.org/10.7001/JTPE.202109_5(2).0001