透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.61.16
  • 期刊

從「現象學反思」到「意識型態批判」-論Husserl與Apel的方法論對比及其在教育研究上的意義

From Phenomenological Reflections to Ideological Critics - Methodological Comparison between Husserl and Apel and its Implications on Educational Research

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文係以方法論的反省為著眼,就Edmund Husserl的「現象學反思」(phenomenological reflection)與Kral-Otto Apel所主張的「意識型態批判」(ideological critics)做為對比的焦點。基於方法對立性的凸顯,本文企圖一方面試著聚焦於「現象學反思」與「意識型態批判」在知識論與方法學上比較;另一方面則為期待透過這樣的對照,進而探索其在教育研究方法論反思上所孕含的意義。

並列摘要


Based on methodological reflection foundation, the researcher compares the methodological standpoints between Edmund Husserl's "phenomenological reflection" and Kral-Otto Apel's "ideological critics" in this paper. The main purposes of this article are as follows: to explore the significance of methodological comparison and inquire its educational research implications.

參考文獻


Delanty, G.(2001).Challenging knowledge: The university in the knowledge society.Buckingham:SRHE and Open University.
Bocock, R.(1993).Consumption.London:Routledge.
Brown, P.,Lauder, H.(1992).Education for economic survival: From fordism to post-fordism.New York:Routledge.
Allen, J.(1992).Political and economic forms of modernity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
Murray, R.(1989).New times.London:Lawrence and Wishart.

延伸閱讀