高中公民與社會科教科書跨學門統整課程之設計

The Design of Integrated Curriculum in High School Civics and Society Textbooks

蘇苑瑜(Yuan-Yu Su) ； 劉美慧(Meihui Liu)

《教育研究集刊》 68:4期 (2022/12) Pp. 1-39

https://doi.org/10.53106/102887082022126804001

摘要

108課綱課程改革強調跨領域課程統整，規範高中公民與社會科應避免社會科學分論方式組織教材，為教科書編寫的一大挑戰。本研究旨在探討高中公民與社會科教科書跨學門統整課程設計之內涵，以及編者編寫教科書歷程中如何因應課程統整變革及其考量。本研究採二階段研究設計，第一階段透過教科書內容分析，瞭解教科書學習內容概念架構及跨學門統整課程設計情況；第二階段訪談教科書編者，探究教科書課程組織及統整課程設計背後的考量、影響因素及困境。本研究發現，高中公民與社會科教科書統整課程設計傾向學門界線分明的多學科模式。影響教科書統整課程設計之因素及困境，包含：編者認為課綱跨學門課程組織及統整規範不夠具體；編者顧及市場銷售，避免課程組織及統整設計大幅度變動；編審對學門統整認知不同，分論分工編寫方式不及因應跨學門融合設計。

關鍵字

公民與社會科 ； 教科書設計 ； 統整課程

並列摘要

This study explores how integrated curriculum in the textbooks of Civics and Society in senior high schools were designed and how textbook editors responded to integrated curriculum reforms by adopting a two-stage research design. In the first stage, the researchers analyzed learning content structure, and in the second stage, conducted semi-structured interviews with textbook editors to explore their considerations for designing an integrated curriculum and the dilemmas of textbooks' organization and integrated design. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, integrated curriculum in the Civics and Society textbooks of senior high schools were designed from a multidisciplinary perspective, which placed two or more disciplines side-by-side and was not a sufficient condition for interdisciplinary approach. Second, the editors believed that the definition of integrated curriculum in curriculum guidelines were ambiguous. Third, editors avoided dramatic changes in the curriculum organization with concerns to textbook marketing. Fourth, there existed a vast difference between editors and the review committee in the conception of integrated curriculum. Finally, editors did not have enough time to adjust disciplinary-based to interdisciplinary design.

並列關鍵字

Civics and Society ； textbook design ； integrated curriculum

參考文獻

Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00962.x

Nikitina, S. (2005). Pathways of interdisciplinary cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 23(3), 389-425. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2303_3

呂秀蓮（2017）。課綱使用的理論與實例：素養為本課程設計之入門概念。大衛營文化。[Lu, H.-L. (2017). The theory and practice of curriculum guideline: The competency-based curriculum design. Da Wei Ying Culture.]

周淑卿、王郁雯（2019）。從課程統整到跨領域課程：臺灣二十年的論述與問題。教育學報，47（2），41-59。[Chou, S.-C., & Wang, Y.-W. (2019). From curriculum integration to cross-disciplinary curriculum: Twenty Years of reform discourse and problems in Taiwan. Education Journal, 47(2), 41-59.]

國家教育研究院（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程發展建議書。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51082/5dcfe708-8956-4324-867e-564fdecbe001.pdf[National Academic for Educational Research. (2014). Recommendations for curriculum development of 12-year basic education. https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51082/5dcfe708-8956-4324-867e-564fdecbe001.pdf]