合情合理的安排究竟是合誰的情?合誰的理?合情與合理有可能同時實現嗎?是否兩岸雙方都能接受?雖然或許可能都不滿意,但都能勉為接受;並且合情合理應該是一個動態的過程,隨著兩岸變遷而調整;合情合理的安排並非是兩岸任一方所能單方決定,否則就失去意義,淪為各自表述,意義及作用都並不大。兩岸兩會成果是否可視為是合情合理的具體安排?本文從西方相關理論,以兩岸兩會過去的例子進行分析,希望能夠對可以想見未來諸多協商過程中的障礙,找出一些可參考的價值,最終試圖能找出兩岸協商制度化與正常化之研究目的,化合情合理安排之抽象性,轉為具有兩岸特色之兩會協商模式,使兩岸關係更能深化鞏固,以解決實質性的問題。
What is reasonable arrangement between Taiwan and Mainland China? What is different plausible from reasonable? Can two sides of cross -strait accept reasonable arrangement? Reasonable arrangement is not decided by Taiwan and Mainland China. Otherwise it will lose its significance. This article is discussing about Habermas,communication theory、Political communication theory and negotiations theory. The author analysis the case of Straits Exchange Foundation and Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits. and hope that it can find some value. Finally the authors want to find solutions about reasonable arrangement and make cross-strait relations better.