孫星衍《尚書》刑罰解釋的經學觀點－以〈盤庚〉及〈康誥〉為例

本文聚焦孫星衍《尚書今古文注疏》的刑罰解釋，以〈盤庚〉「我乃劓殄滅之，無遺育，無俾易種于茲新邑」，及〈康誥〉「惟弔茲，不于我政人得罪，天惟與我民彝大泯亂。曰：乃其速由文王作罰，刑茲無赦」為例，指出孫星衍堅持三代父子罪不相及的主張，並以〈康誥〉「非汝封刑人殺人，無或刑人殺人；非汝封又曰劓刵人，無或劓刵人」為例，指出孫星衍主張三代刑不上大夫，且無臣隨君相連坐的情形。藉由孫星衍對《尚書》刑罰的解釋，討論其經學觀點，實可發現孫星衍於經義往往有其獨特見解，故其新疏並非全無己見，且亦非完全排斥偽孔《傳》。

關鍵字

孫星衍；《尚書今古文注疏》；刑罰解釋；父子罪不相及；臣不隨君連坐

並列摘要

The paper focuses on the interpretations of punishment in Sun Xingyan's Shangshu jinguwen zhushu. Taking ＂Pan geng＂ and ＂Kang gao＂ as examples, this paper illustrates how Sun Xingyan insisted on the principle that fathers and sons were not implicated in one another's crimes during the Three Dynasties period. Moreover, on the basis of examples found in ＂Kang gao＂, this paper shows how Sun Xingyan held that, during the Three Dynasties period, scholar-bureaucrats were not retroactively punished, and subordinates were not be punished for being connected to a criminal monarch. By examining Sun Xingyan's interpretations of punishment, and discussing his views on Confucian classics studies, it can be found that Sun Xingyan understood and interpreted classics studies in unique ways. Thus, Sun Xingyan's Shangshu jinguwen zhushu is not entirely devoid of his own insights. In addition, we also find that Sun Xingyan does not completely reject the Pseudo-Kong Commentary.

並列關鍵字

Sun Xingyan ； Shangshu jinguwen zhushu ； Interpretations of punishment ； Fathers and sons were not implicated in one another's crimes ； Subordinates were not be punished for being connected to a criminal monarch