- 期刊
- OpenAccess
中國近代史學上的雙重危機：試論「新史學」的誕生及其所面臨的困境
The Dual Crises of Modern Chinese Historiography: Remarks on the Birt of the ＂New History＂ and Its Predicament
並列摘要
Among today's social sciences, history is the only branch indigenous to traditional Chinese learning; thus, using it as a focus to observe how a traditional learning responded to the impact of Western culture is particularly significant Liang Qichao (1873-1929) is commonly regarded as the pioneer of the ＂new history＂ Therefore his transition to Western historiography aptly serves as the point of departure for an analysis of the transformation of modem Chinese historiography. Other leading historians in early Republican Era will also be discussed whenever conducive to strengthening my argument, namely: the birth of the so-called ＂new history＂ did not overcome the dual crises that had caused its transformation; on the contrary, it accelerated the disintegration of Chinese historiography as a whole.
並列關鍵字
無資料延伸閱讀
- 戴景賢（2014）。論現代中國史研究之雙重意義。政大中文學報，(21)，245-277。https://doi.org/10.30407/BDCL.201406_(21).0009
- 沈清松（2010）。當代中華新士林哲學與現代性困境的超克。哲學與文化，37(11)，5-22。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.201011.0005
- 任劍濤（2009）。中國人文與社會科學的結構性危機。二十一世紀，(111)，76-83。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20200814001-200902-202109030017-202109030017-76-83
- 肖小穗（2014）。Regrets about American Historiography on Modern Chinese Transformation: From a Rhetorical Point of View。中華傳播學刊，(26)，35-62。https://doi.org/10.6195/cjcr.2014.26.02
- 杜維運（1976）。The Spread of Western Historiography to China。臺大歷史學報，(3)，409-440。https://doi.org/10.6253/ntuhistory.1976.03.16