Using the third-person effect hypothesis, this study investigates voters' perceptions of the effect of negative 2008 presidential election news in Taiwan and the perceptions' relationship to censorship and voting behaviors. Message desirability was determined by voters' party affiliations and the candidate under attack. An analysis on the responses from 829 randomly-sampled participants revealed that when participants saw their own candidates attacked, they reported they were not very influenced, but they said others would be. This third-person differential disappeared when they saw an attack on the candidate they disliked. Although the third-person effect did not have influence on the intentions to discuss negative presidential election news with others, a significant relationship existed between banning negative presidential election news and third-person perception level. In addition, the third-person differential was positively associated with the likelihood to vote and negatively associated with the likelihood to change voting decisions, which expands third-person behavioral domains beyond censorship issues.