透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.74.153
  • 期刊

網絡新聞文本公共商議性研究-以新冠疫情初期中國大陸相關報導為例

Deliberative Analysis of Online News: A Case Study of Vaccine-Related News during the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mainland China

摘要


本文以中國大陸新冠疫苗報導為研究對象,探索性地對網絡新聞文本是否具有商議特性進行總體性考察。採取混合研究法,以計算社會科學中的主題模型為主要方法,同時對重點文本進行深入人工解讀。研究結果顯示:(1)從包容性角度,較為完整地呈現了新冠疫苗問題的複雜維度和發展脈絡。但同時大量表揚性、同質性文本被廣泛傳播,損害了文本的多樣性。(2)從互動性角度,商業門戶網站承擔著信息擴散角色,但大量宣傳性報導充斥其間。普通民眾與其他四類主體在議題關注和文本框架上形成較大反差,形成「傳播力度強但對話性薄弱」之特點。(3)從理性角度,文本情感充沛、情感兩極分化嚴重,形成「對外批評對內謳歌」之特點。上述發現表明,網絡新聞文本雖具有部分商議性特徵,但與公共商議精神要義仍相去甚遠。

並列摘要


This study analyzed the text of COVID-19 vaccine news that appear on the Internet in mainland China to identify the deliberation feature of online news reports in a holistic way. Using a mixed research approach, we analyzed the large scale of news reports by topic modeling method and interpreted the result from the theoretical perspective. The findings show that, first, in terms of inclusiveness, the news text presents the complex dimensions and context of the COVID-19 vaccine, while a large proportion of homogeneous praising texts also damage the diversity of the texts. Second, from the perspective of interactivity, business portals take the role of information diffusion but disseminate similar texts. Ordinary people and professional media organizations represented by the central media showed a huge contrast in terms of topic concerns and text frames, which we describe as dissemination with weak communication. Third, from a rational point of view, texts are generally full of emotions, with a sharp polarized contrast of the positive emotions toward domestic issues and negative emotions toward international ones. The above findings indicate that while the online news text has some deliberative characteristics, it is still far from the essence of public deliberation.

參考文獻


人民日報社新聞協調部(2020)。〈唱響眾志成城抗擊疫情最強音 —人民日報社全力做好疫情防控報導發揮排頭兵作用〉。《中國報業》,第5期,頁32–35。Renmin ribaoshe xinwen xietiaobu (2020). Changxiang zhongzhi chengcheng kangji yiqing zuiqiangyin—Renmin Ribaoshe quanli zuohao yiqing fangkong baodao fahui paitoubing zuoyong. Zhongguo baoye, 5, 32–35.
于紅梅(2017)。〈從「We Media」到「自媒體」—對一個概念的知識考古〉。《新聞記者》,第12期,頁49–62。Yu Hongmei (2017). Cong ‘We Media’ dao ‘zimeiti’—Dui yige gainian de zhishi kaogu. Xinwen jizhe, 12, 49–62.
王紹光(2006)。〈中國公共政策議程設置的模式〉。《中國社會科學》,第5期,頁86–99、207。Wang Shaoguang (2006). Zhongguo gonggong zhengce yicheng shezhi de moshi. Zhongguo shehui kexue, 5, 86–99, 207.
王蕊、周佳、李純清(2019)。〈網絡輿情事件中的協商有效性評估與測量指標建構〉。《當代傳播》,第6期,頁55–58。Wang Rui, Zhou Jia, Li Chunqing (2019). Wangluo yuqing shijian zhong de xieshang youxiaoxing pinggu yu celiang zhibiao jiangou. Dangdai chuanbo, 6, 55–58.
李良榮(2015)。《新傳播革命》。上海:復旦大學出版社。Li Liangrong (2015). Xin chuanbo geming. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe.

延伸閱讀