- 期刊
- OpenAccess
- Ahead-of-Print
Automated Closed-Loop Propofol Anesthesia Versus Desflurane Inhalation Anesthesia in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Randomized Analysis of Recovery Profile
摘要
Introduction: Precision general anesthesia (GA) techniques that minimize the presence of residual anesthetic and facilitate recovery, are desirable in patients with morbid obesity. Automated administration of propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), which facilitates precision propofol delivery by factoring in continuous patient input variable (bispectral index) to establish a closed feedback loop system, may help mitigate concerns related to propofol's lipid solubility and adverse accumulation kinetics in patients with morbid obesity. This randomized study evaluated the recovery of patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery under propofol TIVA automated by a closed-loop anesthesia delivery system (CLADS) versus desflurane GA. Methods: Forty patients, randomly allocated to receive propofol TIVA (CLADS group) or desflurane GA (desflurane group), were evaluated for postoperative recovery (early and intermediate) (primary objective); they were evaluated for intraoperative hemodynamics, anesthesia depth consistency, anesthesia delivery performance characteristics, patient satisfaction, and incidence of adverse events (sedation, pain, postoperative nausea, and vomiting) (secondary objective). Results: No difference was found for the time-to-eye-opening (CLADS group: 4.7 [3.0, 6.7] min vs. desflurane group: 5.6 [4.0, 6.9] min, P = 0.576), time-to-tracheal-extubation (CLADS group: 6.7 [4.7, 9.3] min vs. desflurane group: 7.0 [5.8, 9.2] min, P = 0.528), ability-to-shift score from operating room table to the transport bed (CLADS group: 3 [3.0, 3.5] vs. desflurane group: 3 [3.0, 4.0], P = 0.703), and time to achieve a modified Aldrete score 9/10 (CLADS group: 15 [15.0, 37.5] min vs. desflurane group: 15 [15.0, 43.7] min, P = 0.867). Conclusion: Automated propofol TIVA as administered by CLADS, which matched desflurane GA with respect to depth of anesthesia consistency and postanesthesia recovery profile, can be explored further as an alternative anesthesia technique in patients with morbid obesity.
延伸閱讀
- Su, T. H., Li, K. Y., Chen, T. S., Chang, S. C., Su, Y. K., Li, C. Y., & Lam, C. F. (2023). Short-Term Outcomes of Low Versus High Inspiratory Oxygen Fraction during Induction of General Anesthesia in Noncardiac Surgery: A Pragmatic Open-Label Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial. E-Da Medical Journal, 10(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.6966/EDMJ.202303_10(1).0004
- Seyfi, S., amiri, H. A., Banihashem, N., Ezoji, K., & Ziaei, S. G. (2019). An Investigation Into Quality of Recovery After General Anesthesia With Isoflurane and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy. Asian Journal of Anesthesiology, (), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202208/PP.0001
- Seyfi, S., Amiri, H. A., Banihashem, N., Ezoji, K., & Ziaei, S. G. (2022). An Investigation Into Quality of Recovery After General Anesthesia With Isoflurane and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy. Asian Journal of Anesthesiology, 60(3), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202209_60(3).0003
- Lai, H. C., Hung, N. K., Lin, B. F., Chen, J. L., Huang, Y. H., & Wu, Z. F. (2019). Lower Incidence of Prolonged Extubation in Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared with Desflurane Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Medical Sciences, 39(3), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_157_18
- Lai, H. C., Huang, Y. H., Lu, C. H., Hung, N. K., Wong, C. S., & Wu, Z. F. (2019). Comparison of Anesthesia-Controlled Operating Room Time Between Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Desflurane Anesthesia in Open Liver Resection: A Retrospective Study. Asian Journal of Anesthesiology, (), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202005/PP.0003