透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.116.183
  • 期刊

提升三創類通識課程學習成效之教學歷程探討-以「生活創意發想與實作」為例

Discussion on the Instructional Process to Improve Learning Efficiency for General Education - Using the Course "Creative Ideas and Implementation in Daily Life" as an Example

摘要


本研究旨在歸納開授「生活創意發想與實作」通識課程之教學歷程,透過不斷地行動與調整,建構創新的教學歷程,以提升學習成效與教學產出。在開授的五學期期間,以教育行動研究的精神為基,採取規劃、執行、省思、修正行動方案與再執行的歷程。教學模式主要援引Parnes(1967)提出的「創意解難」(CPS)教學模式,透過設計教學活動,基於醫事健康的學校特色,引導學生進行生活用品與橘色科技的發想與創作。研究者並將教學產出充分擴展延伸,指導學生團隊獲得國際發明展金牌獎、教育部實務專題競賽前三名等佳績,並有專利和技術轉移等具體產出。

並列摘要


This study aims to summarize the instructional process for the general education course "creative ideas and implementation in daily life," which has been taught for five terms hitherto. The ultimate goal of this study is to improve learning efficiency and teaching output via consistent action, adjustment and creation of the new instructional process. In the five terms in which the course was delivered, the spirit of education action research remained the basis of a process that involved planning, execution, reflection, correction, and re-execution. The teaching model mainly modified the creative problem solving (CPS) model proposed by Parnes (1967). The teaching focus is on medical health, which is a characteristic of the school, and students are guided to create and develop ideas in terms of orange technology and daily needs. Researchers have completely extended the course's teaching output by guiding student teams to earn the honor of a gold medal at an international innovation fair and rank among the top three in an application-based project competition by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (MOE), in addition to obtain patents and technology transfers.

參考文獻


中華醫事科技大學(2017)。高等教育深耕計畫申請書(未出版)。臺南市:作者。
王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀(2014)。「科學創造性問題解決測驗」之發展。測驗學刊,61(3),337-360。
朱耀明、林怡君、張美珍、王裕宏(2010)。科學現象下的科技創意發想情況與侷限之分析──以高中生高溫超導競賽為例。工業科技教育學刊,2,7-16。
吳清山、林天佑(1999)。教育名詞:行動研究。教育資料與研究,27,66。
吳雅萍(2009)。創造性問題解決教學對學生學習成效影響之後設分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。

延伸閱讀