摘要
一、2017年6月中印在洞朗邊界對峙的姿態逐步升高，戰爭一觸即發。就在廈門金磚峰會前一周，印度從洞朗撤兵，結束72天的對峙事件，對峙期間雙方都採取了優勢戰略作為，為各自爭取了最大的利益。二、印度的戰略布局：一方面聯合美國、日本、澳洲、越南；二方面積極拉攏周邊的孟加拉、緬甸、斯里蘭卡，並給予尼泊爾和不丹施加外交壓力，也想拉攏蒙古，企圖對中共形成包圍態勢；三方面持續增兵中印邊界，擺開一副準備戰爭架式；四方面印度的輿論界為政府塗脂抹粉，塑造軍隊實力堅強、不畏戰的形象。三、中共的戰略布局除增兵青藏高原和南疆，持續大規模軍演之外，亦啟動對南亞各國的外交統一戰線，並結合輿論戰、心理戰和法律戰，塑造中共合法捍衛領土主權的正當形象。四、對峙事件在各方關注下落幕。從結果來看，中印相爭旗鼓相當，大國博弈不相上下，彼此智慧各有千秋；從整體觀察，前者更重視長遠的戰略利益，後者顯然比較看重眼前的好處。
並列摘要
1.India-China border disputes in a high attitude. It seems to be war. However, Indian army disengaged from Doklam a week before the BRICS Summit in Xiamen and ended an unprecedented 72 days standoff event so as to avoid a crisis of the 2nd Sino-India war. For gathering maximum interests, both sides took dominance strategies during Doklam standoff. 2.Indian strategic layouts: (1)joint USA, Japan, Australia, and Vietnam; (2)strive for Bangladesh, Burma, Sri Lanka, Mongolia, and pressure to Nepal and Bhutan; (3)strength en army to borders as ready to fight; and (4)media report strong combat capability of the Indian army. 3.Chinese strategic layouts: (1)dispatching army to Tibet plateau and Southern Xinjiang; (2)ongoing large military exercises; (3)making diplomatic united front; and (4)joint media, psychological, and legal warfare. 4.Sum-up the end of border disputes, China and India are comparable in fluence and power, equal in games, and great points in their wisdom. The former is more concerned with far-reaching strategic interests, and the latter would apparently prefer to advantages in hand.
延伸閱讀
- 趙國材（2020）。中印邊界爭端：軍事和外交的升溫。海峽評論，(356)，26-29。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000495-202008-202009020019-202009020019-26-29
- 侯長坤（2021）。中國「常態化」的國際政治認知解讀：以中印兩次邊界衝突的化解為例。國際關係學報，(52)，81-104。https://doi.org/10.30413/TJIR.202112_(52).0003
- 陳純如（2018）。洞朗事件對中印邊界問題與中印關係之影響。問題與研究，57(1)，105-116。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201803_57(1).0004
- 孫若怡（2020）。山姆大叔的司馬昭之心 中印皆知－中印邊界糾紛的省思。海峽評論，(356)，21-25。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000495-202008-202009020019-202009020019-21-25
- Amrita Jash（2015）。印中關係的「競合」動力：政治敵對vs.經濟交往。全球政治評論，()，17-37。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17263786-201504-201505290006-201505290006-17-37