從「基本能力」到「核心素養」－社會認識論的分析

回顧台灣近年來兩波課程改革，分別訴諸「基本能力」與「核心素養」兩種觀點，各自的意涵背後涉及了不同的知識觀和意識型態。然而，植基於改革生態學的視野，這兩波課程改革的核心觀點之所以轉變，其實還涉及了歷史脈絡下知識和權力的社會結構辯證關係。值此，本研究採用Popkewitz「社會認識論」的觀點，分析「基本能力」與「核心素養」理念背後論述實踐的時空背景，繼而提出從「認識論」轉向「存有論」的論點，並描繪出課程改革的未來願景。

關鍵字

課程改革；基本能力；核心素養；社會認識論；存有論

並列摘要

This article reviews the two waves of curriculum reform in Taiwan in recent years, which refer to the perspectives of ＂basic ability＂ and ＂core competence＂ that involve different knowledge types and ideologies. Based on the perspective of reform ecology, the core viewpoints of the two waves of curriculum reform have also involved the dialectical relationship between the social structure of knowledge and power in the historical context. On this occasion, the study is intended to adopt T. S. Popkewitz's idea of ＂social epistemology＂ as the methodology to analyze the space-time background of the discursive practice of ＂basic ability＂ and ＂core competence,＂ and then puts forward the argument of turning from ＂epistemology＂ to ＂ontology,＂ depicting the future vision of the curriculum reform.

並列關鍵字

curriculum reform ； basic ability ； core competence ； social epistemology ； ontology

參考文獻

歐用生（2009）。〈學校本位課程評鑑的視野 ─雲林縣學校優質轉型經驗的省思〉。《課程與教學季刊》，第 12 卷第 1 期，頁 1–24。doi: 10.6384/CIQ.200901.0001

楊俊鴻（2011）。〈世界主義課程論述 ─理念、模式及實際〉。《中正教育研究》，第 10 卷第 2 期，頁 27–55。doi: 10.3966/168395522011121002001

鍾鴻銘（2016）。〈T. Popkewitz 的後現代課程史研究進路及其意涵〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》，第 16 卷第 2 期，頁 105–151。doi: 10.3966/168020042016121602004

Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. (2004). Introduction: Educational restructuring: (Re)thinking the problematic of reform. In S. Lindblad & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Educational restructuring: International perspectives on traveling policies (pp. vii–xxxi). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Google Scholar

Macdonald, J. B. (1988). Theory-practice and the hermeneutic circle. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 101–133). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.

Google Scholar

國際替代計量

從「基本能力」到「核心素養」－社會認識論的分析

全文下載

主題瀏覽