- 期刊
基督論的方法論問題－施萊馬哈與蒂利希比較
On Approaches to Christology: A Comparison between Schleiermacher and Tillich
並列摘要
This article puts Schleiermacher and Tillich in confrontation. It argues that the similarity between them is superficial, for they in fact lead to two opposite directions in their approaching Christology. The resistance to transformation within a conceptual Christology, as displayed by the Scholastics, is indeed the primary concern in Schleiermacher's discussions. And he insists that only Christ's redemption which imparts the God-consciousness to us is able to lead to breaking up the resistance. In contrast, by emphasizing the role of reason in theological discussions, Tillich bases his understanding of incarnation upon certain concepts, which logically self-assume absoluteness and block criticisms. The negative attitude to reason by Schleiermacher allows the further development of reason, while Tillich's affirmative attitude indeed tends to close the door.
並列關鍵字
無資料延伸閱讀
- 賴品超（1998）。從士來馬赫看基督教神學與宗教學。建道學刊，(10)，81-108。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20220215001-199807-202203250010-202203250010-81-108
- 王計然（2019）。哈茨霍恩對基督教愛觀的創新性理解及其比較宗教學價值。道風：基督教文化評論，(51)，231-257。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20170411002-201907-201908280006-201908280006-231-257
- 瞿旭彤（2015）。普遍與特殊：從蒂利希與巴特一九二三年的爭論看兩人神學立場與進路的差異。道風：基督教文化評論，(43)，151-178。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20170411002-201507-201708100020-201708100020-151-178
- 王濤（2007）。書評：馬基《基督教與創造：基督教信仰的本質及其在諸宗教間的未來，一個系統神學》。輔仁宗教研究，(16)，131-135。https://doi.org/10.29449/FJRS.200712.0008
- 陳家富（2003）。Theology of Nature in Early Tillich: An Approach to Ecological Theology。道風：基督教文化評論，(18)，89-121+312。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20170411002-200301-201705160015-201705160015-89-121+312