透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.4
  • 期刊

師資生線上負向情緒調節體驗之探究

Preservice Teachers' Sharing of Negative Emotion Regulation Experiences on an Online Platform

摘要


本研究旨在透過「負向情緒調節體驗平台」,廣泛地分析師資生面臨線上「師資生困境故事」所進行的情緒調節(emotion regulation)。包括:第一,融入意義治療法之概念,探討師資生從該困境故事中看出的潛在正面意義(開放式問題一);第二,探討師資生若為該困境故事主角,擬採取因應以舒緩負向情緒的方式(開放式問題二)。本研究以質性內容分析法之傳統內容分析取向,分析上述開放式問題一與問題二,並搭配量化的資料進行初步探究。本研究的研究對象為來自臺灣各大學師資培育課程的294位師資生。本研究發現,就開放式問題一,師資生按回應次數依序為:「自我磨練與成長的機會」、「至少仍有的優勢與好處」、「自我思量、自我步調調整與規劃的契機」、「對未來願景∕正向結果的期望與信念」;至於開放式問題二,師資生按回應次數依序為:「問題解決-積極規劃∕安排與行動因應」、「放鬆紓壓與轉移焦點」、「問題解決-尋求支持、支援與資源」、「自我認知與情緒的調整」、「坦然面對與接受」、「問題解決-問題思量」、「消極因應」。本研究的研究結果期為我國師資培育的輔導與教學實務提供一些建議。

並列摘要


An online platform was developed for examining the negative emotion regulation experiences of preservice teachers. On the platform, participants were asked to read vignettes related to preservice teachers' adversities. Through the online examination of negative emotion regulation experiences, this study investigated (1) the positive takeaways participants gleaned from adversities under the concept of logotherapy (the first open-ended question) and (2) how participants planned to cope with adversities to regulate their negative emotions (the second open-ended question). Through qualitative content analysis, a conventional content analysis approach, this study analyzed the responses to the aforementioned open-ended questions. Preliminary quantitative analyses were also adopted to gain supplementary information . The participants were 294 preservice teachers in Taiwan. The findings were as follows. In response to the first open-ended question, preservice teachers mentioned "the opportunity for self-training and development," "the minimal benefits," "the opportunity for self-reflection, modification, and planning," and "expectations and beliefs related to positive future outcomes" as positive takeaways. In response to the second open-ended question, which asked participants how they planned to cope with adversities to regulate their negative emotions, the participants mentioned "problem solving: active organization/arrangement and action," "relaxation and the deployment of attention," "problem solving: seeking social support and resources," "modification of self-cognition and emotions," "facing challenges and acceptance," "problem solving: problem pondering," and "passive coping." These responses have implications for counseling and instruction in teacher education programs in Taiwan.

參考文獻


王櫻芬(2012)。情緒調節在青少年人際依附與心理困擾之中介角色分析研究。教育心理學報,44(2),273-294。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20111129。
江文慈(2004a)。大學生的情緒調整歷程與發展特徵。教育心理學報,35(3),249-268。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20030731。
江文慈(2004b)。實習教師的情緒地圖:社會建構的觀點。教育心理學報,36(1),59-83。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20040506。
張學善(2004)。情緒管理課程對提升教育學程學生情緒智慧之成效研究。彰化師大輔導學報,26(2),37-56。https://doi.org/10.7040/GJ.200412.0037。
楊琬琳、鍾宜君(2020)。批判教育學視角下實習教師的實習困境與因應策略。教育研究與發展期刊,16(2),31-61。https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202006_16(2).0002。

被引用紀錄


黃絢質(2023)。大學生的社會情緒學習素養與其對嘲弄的正向感知之關係-以情緒調節策略為中介變項教育心理學報55(2),241-268。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0002

延伸閱讀