透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.137.183.14
  • 期刊

論古城貞吉《支那文學史》中的清代詩壇

On Qing Dynasty's Poetry in Kojo Teikichi's "History of Chinese Literature"

摘要


十九世紀末以降,以中國古典文學為討論範疇之文學史著作相繼問世,彼時日本學者所著作之《支那文學史》,嘗試以西方文學史概念,將中國古典文學進行歷時性研究。此類著作的出版,更影響二十世紀初期之中國學者《中國文學史》之成書。本文以日人古城貞吉(1866-1949)成於1897年之《支那文學史》為軸心,論其人對清代詩壇詩家之取捨。有別於後世由中國學者所著之《中國文學史》,以神韻、格調、肌理等詩派的劃分,此《支那文學史》對選家的注重有勝於詩派的趨勢,在選家上,亦顯示與中國本土迥異的審美。本文以文學史作者古城貞吉的生平背景,以及明治日本(1868-1912)對清詩的受容著眼,探究其此現象之成因,並參酌同時代之笹川臨風(1870-1949)、中根淑(1839-1913)、兒島獻吉郎(1866-1931)等人的文學史著作,探討古城貞吉與同時代學人的殊性與共性,解讀明治時期文學史家論清代詩壇時,為何顯現出別於中國本土的清代詩壇之樣貌。

並列摘要


Since the end of the nineteenth century, literary history works with Chinese classical literature as the discussion category have come out one after another. At that time, "History Of Chinese Literature" by Japanese scholars tried to study Chinese classical literature diachronically with the concept of western literary history. The publication of such works has even influenced the writing of Chinese Scholars in the History of Chinese Literature in the early 20th century. This article takes the Japanese Kojo Teikichi (1866-1949), the History of Chinna Literature, which was formed in 1897 as the axis, and discusses his choice of poets in the Qing Dynasty. Different from the "History of Chinese Literature" written by Chinese scholars in the later generations, divided by poetics such as spiritual Resonance, gediao(character and style) and texture theory, this "Chinese Literature History" pays more attention to poets than poets. It also shows a different aesthetic from the Chinese mainland. This article looks at the background of the history of the author of the history of literature Kojo Teikichi and the acceptance of Qing poetry by Meiji Japan(1868-1912), and explores the causes of this phenomenon, and considers the contemporaries of Sasakawa rinpu (1870-1949) and Nakane Kiyoshi(1839-1913), Kojima Kenkichiro(1866-1931) and other literary history works, exploring the specialities and commonalities of the Kojo Teikichi and his contemporaries, and explaining why the literary historians of the Meiji period were different from the Chinese poetry in Qing Dynasty The appearance of the native Qing poetry.

延伸閱讀