Exploration of Closed Loop Integration Teaching Mode of Group Cooperation with Optimized Division of Labor

Xianghong He ； Dalu Nie ； Jie Zhu ； Shulan Gao

《International Journal of Social Science and Education Research》 4卷1期 (2021/01) Pp. 154-159

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202101_4(1).0023

摘要

Through the comparison of multi angle testing and optimization tools of several teaching platforms, combined with the characteristics of online teaching and the actual test and application effect, we put forward the concept and specific implementation method of closed‐loop integration of team cooperation to optimize the division of labor, and also give the specific solutions. Through the test, the mode's group cooperation, optimized division of labor, efficient application, closed‐loop integration and resource sharing forms can effectively carry out online teaching content without class suspension. Based on the commonness of online teaching, this model is not only suitable for mathematics, but also suitable for group cooperation, closed‐loop integration, resource sharing mode and multi platform and multi angle teaching integration concept Used in other disciplines.

關鍵字

Optimization of division of labor ； Group cooperation ； Closed loop integration ； Resource sharing

參考文獻

Yan Zhengshu, Xu Jihui. Online and offline integration of Internet plus personalized teaching mode [J]. China occupation and technology education, 2016.5.

Gao manru, Shen liangzhongmin township. Construction of teacher student learning community based on Moodle platform, educational theory and practice [J], No. 3, 2018, 40-41.

Fang Lin. on the current situation, problems and embedding path of "online teaching" in Colleges and universities [J]. Market research. 2018, (12): 15-17.

Zhang Zengming. 64 class hour college physics experiment online teaching scheme and design ideas [J]. Physics and engineering.

Zhang Yi, Wang Zhihui. The role of "micro class" in College Physics Experiment -- Taking North University for Nationalities as an example [J]. Curriculum education research, 2017 (35): 187-188.