透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.241.82

摘要


This study is to fill the blanks of comprehensive review of text readability in China so as to offer references both to scholars who are dedicated themselves to these areas and to learners and practitioners who are still struggling with readability. In order to do that, affecting factors, measurements, and previous studies and further trends constitute this research. We found that the measurements of readability largely limit to lexis and syntax factors. Besides, studies of readability have been stagnant on its measurement and influencing factors. Thus, on the one hand, we encourage scholars to further update readability formula which takes reader factors, setting and genres into consideration. On the other hand, studies on the relationship between readability and lexical richness, online learning environment, teachers' and peers' support deserve our attention.

參考文獻


Betts A. Readability: Its Application to the Elementary School. Journal of Educational Research, Vol.42 (1949), p.438,
Hartley, J. and Benjamin, M. An Evaluation of Structured Abstracts in Journals Published by the British Psychological Society. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 68, 1998, p.443-45.
Lake J. Positive L2 Self: Linking Positive Psychology with L2 Motivation[A]. In Apple M T, Da Silva D. & Felloner T (eds). Language Learning Motivation in Japan[C]. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2013, p.225-244.
MacIntyre P. & Gregersen. T. Emotions that Facilitate Language Learning: The Positive-broadening Power of the Imagination. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, Vol.2(2012), p.193–213.
Metoyer-D. The readability of published, accepted, and rejected papers appearing in College & Research Libraries.College & Research Libraries, Vol.54 (1993), No.6, p. 517.

延伸閱讀