透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.13.173
  • 期刊

臺北市古蹟容積移轉政策內涵與困境之探討

An Exploratory Essay on Contradictions and Contexts in the policy of Historic Property Development Rights Transfer in Taipei City

摘要


古蹟保存在論述、公共領域與政策交互中,其主體意義是動態變動的存在?還是操縱在發展意識?本文發現臺灣古蹟容積移轉制度,歷經作為文化財保存的發展權限制的救濟措施、「政府財政危機下的公共設施保留地問題解決」與「新自由主義下的容積發展權遊戲」,已經影響古蹟保存公共領域,容積移轉開啟古蹟保存,現在卻在新自由主義的都市權力遊戲,產生困境。在此困境,重構古蹟保存的公共領域特別關鍵。另外,在政策層次如何以更優質的治理技術,來回應古蹟保存的公共性,亦刻不容緩。

並列摘要


This article investigates whether, in the interaction between the public sphere and heritage conservation policies, the subjective meanings of conservation per se are dynamically modifiable or whether government responds to conscious changes in development policy. By exploring conservation practice and property development restrictions in Taiwan, three types of conservation systems have been articulated: remedial measures for those landowners whose development rights are limited by heritage conservation; acquiring of reserved land for public amenity under government fiscal crisis; and development capacity games under neo-liberalism. These types of development exercise have affected public sector heritage conservation and revitalized heritage, but with the current development system, the exercise has turned into a form of neoliberal urban power game and is an obstacle to conservation. The meanings of heritage conservation is dynamic, envisaging the constraint, and reconstruction of public sector heritage conservation is particularly important. In addition, the way authority sophisticatedly modifies its governance responding to structural changes is also urgently demanding.

參考文獻


行政院經濟建設委員會都市及住宅發展處,2008,都市及區域發展統計彙編。
李建榮,1997年04月25日,連戰同意試辦容積轉移:公設地可不必動用預算徵收創新作法預計可釋出一萬六千公頃土地,中國時報,第七版。
林崇傑,2008,臺灣運用容積移轉於歷史保存之政策與實踐之檢討,文資學報,第四期。
林淑玲,1999年02月05日,容積率移轉先由古蹟試辦一年行政院會通過暫時放棄全面實施待內政部修法後再議,中國時報,第六版。
陳明通,2005,派系政治與臺灣政治變遷,台北:月旦。

延伸閱讀