Objectives: Medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap is considered as one of the best options for reconstructing defects that require thin and pliable coverage. However, higher failure rate precludes this flap from gaining consensus as the first choice. This study focuses on increasing the reliability of the flap and expanding its versatility to cover even middle-third-leg defects. Methods: A retrospective study was performed to analyze patients who underwent medial sural artery perforator flap surgery between 2016 and 2019. The data collected included demographics, surgical indications, operative details, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to assess outcomes. Results: Out of the total 86 patients enrolled in the study, eight (9.4%) were excluded because no sizeable perforators were found. Seventy-eight patients underwent medial sural artery flap reconstruction with 63 free and 15 pedicled flaps. Four patients with middle-third leg defects were reconstructed with a "pedicled propeller MSAP flap". There were two flap failures, and the overall success rate was 97.4%. Conclusions: MSAP flap is reliable for the reconstruction of small- to medium-sized defects that require thin skin coverage. Careful flap selection and proper techniques are key factors in increasing its reliability. Conversion to another flap is indicated if no sizable perforators can be found. The "pedicled propeller flap" technique allows successful coverage even in middle-third leg defects.