透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.23.123
  • 期刊

「一國兩制」背景下的粵港澳大灣區合作:與歐盟和三藩市灣區比較

Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Cooperation under 'One Country, Two Systems': Comparison with European Union and San Francisco Bay Area

摘要


自2015年「粵港澳大灣區」概念被正式提出以來,大灣區如何合作成為學界關注的焦點,然而,「一國兩制」背景下粵港澳大灣區合作的定位及發展走向等問題仍缺乏深度探討。本文立足於「一國兩制」,從治理制度、治理機制和政治互信三個維度,將粵港澳大灣區與歐盟、三藩市灣區進行比較分析。我們發現,粵港澳大灣區的合作發展面臨一系列挑戰:港澳高度自治與大灣區一體化規劃之間存在張力,中央主導作為一把「雙刃劍」在推動合作時亦容易扼制地方內生能動性,以及政治互信缺乏制度化保障及文化認同基礎等。在「一國兩制」獨特制度框架下,粵港澳大灣區未來如何發展既挑戰政府管治能力,亦考驗商界和民間的智慧,值得各界深入討論。

並列摘要


Since the concept of 'Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area' was formally proposed in 2015, the cooperation of the Greater Bay Area has become a hot topic in academic circles. However, in-depth discussion on the positioning and development direction of the Greater Bay Area cooperation under the context of 'one country, two systems' remains lacking. This paper compared the Greater Bay Area with the European Union and the San Francisco Bay Area from the governance system, governance mechanism and political mutual trust. The cooperation and development of the Greater Bay Area has encountered a series of challenges: the tension between the high degree of autonomy of Hong Kong and Macao and the integrated planning of the Greater Bay Area, the balance between the central promotion and local endogenous impetus and lack of political mutual trust. Under the 'one country, two systems', the future cooperation and development of the Greater Bay Area will not only challenge the governments' governance capacity but also the wisdom of the business community and civil society, which is worthy of further in-depth exploration.

參考文獻


貝阿特,科勒,科赫,吳志成(2005):〈社會進程視角下的歐洲區域一體化分析〉,載《南開學報:哲學社會科學版》,第 1 期,頁 1-9。
曹建明(2000):《歐盟聯盟法——從歐洲統一大市場到歐洲經濟貨幣聯盟》,杭州:浙江人民出版社。
陳瑞蓮(2006):〈歐盟國家的區域協調發展:經驗與啟示〉,載《政治學研究》,第 3 期,頁 118-128。
陳德昇(2020):〈跨界治理策略,機遇與挑戰:粵港澳大灣區發展案例〉,載《中國大陸研究》,第 63 卷第 3 期,頁 47-82。
陳華昇(2018):〈香港「一地兩檢」立法爭議之評析〉,載《展望與探索月刊》,第 16 卷第 8 期,頁 23-28。

延伸閱讀