- 期刊
The Supreme Court Civil Grand Chambers recognizes that non-pecuniary damages should be included when calculating punitive damages pursuant to the Consumer Protection Act
延伸閱讀
- Juang, K. Y. C. (2014). Judgment Observation: Intellectual Property Court's View on Damages Calculation Method Based on Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 97 of the Amended Patent Act. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2014(7), 21-24. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110420002-201407-201408110013-201408110013-21-24
- Lai, W. P., & Kao, S. (2021). The Ruling of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court Dated Jan. 27, 2021-The scope of the Supreme Court's review when defendants appeal the charges they are guilty of. LEE AND LI BULLETIN, 2021(2), 20-21. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20201214001-202102-202103040009-202103040009-20-21
- 洪珮瑜（2023）。Applicable Circumstances of Post-Grant Amendments during Patent Litigation under the New Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act。萬國法律，(248)，46-53。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15606473-N202304010017-00005
- 戴志傑（2021）。The extent of the damages under Article 51 of the Consumer Protection Act-Commenting on 108-No.2680 Ruling (2021) of the Civil Grand Court the Supreme Court。靜宜法學，(10)，125-158。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20191106001-202112-202209200016-202209200016-125-158
- 李宜穎（2008）。Punitive Damages under Article 51 Consumer Protection Law〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.01705