並列摘要
Some scholars mantain hat the Hetu-vidya (因明) is in logical form and term it as ＂Indian logic＂. It is the author's conception however that Hetu-vidya is a form of reduction and that logic, in a strict sense, is itself deductive. A Hetu-vidya argument is composed of two parts: 1) to trace its sufficient condition from the conclusion-the inductive part; 2) to assert the conclusion as a logical consequence-the deductive part. These two parts stand complementary to each other and this form of argument will not stand if any one of them is left out. The author also disagrees with the Japanese scholars who interpret the concept that ＂at least no less than one member of the class has the sufficient condition＂ (同品定有性) according to the syllogism point of view.
並列關鍵字
無資料延伸閱讀
- 陳怡伶（2010）。科學邏輯的應用〔碩士論文，淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.01006
- 文思慧（1986）。淺論有關因果性及發現邏輯的一些哲學問題－疏解兩則非形式謬誤。鵝湖月刊，(127)，19-26。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198601.0005
- 陳榮波（1981）。語言的邏輯。鵝湖月刊，(67)，39-50。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198101.0008
- Provinsky, P. (2017). FLOPPY LOGIC- A YOUNGER SISTER OF FUZZY LOGIC. Neural Network World, 27(5), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2017.27.025
- 陳美慧（2011）。Heart-lotus Guardians。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌，10(4)，50-51。https://doi.org/10.6974/TCNJ.201108.0050