論專利之更正－以與日本法之比較為中心

Post-Grant Amendment of Patent- Perspectives from Japanese Law

龐永昌(Wing-Cheong Pong)

指導教授 ： 黃銘傑

國立臺灣大學/法律學院/法律學研究所/碩士(2017年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702534

摘要

更正係專利法上給予專利權人就其專利說明書、申請專利範圍或圖式為修改之機會，其中，就得為更正之範圍為何，將牽涉我國之更正制度應如何權衡專利權人與第三人之權益，此外，更正將對於民事訴訟及行政訴訟產生如何之影響，亦為專利法上之重要課題。
　　本文將以法規及實務問題上均類似之日本法為比較對象，就更正之各項議題為討論，包括專利整體性概念對於更正之影響、更正之更正要件於立法論及解釋論上之探討、民事訴訟中有更正申請時法院應如何為審理及更正得否作為原確定判決之再審事由，以及行政爭訟中得否為更正等議題。

關鍵字

專利 ； 更正 ； 第一次判斷權

並列摘要

The Patent Act provides a patentee has the opportunity to amend the description, claim(s) or drawing(s) of a granted patent. There are many important issues about a post-grant amendment of patent, including what is the extent of a post-grant amendment of patent, which is involved with how to balance rights and interests between the patentee and the third party, and how may a post-grant amendment of patent affect civil suits and administrative litigation.
　　All issues in this thesis are compared with the Japanese law, including how may the conception of the integrity of patent affect a post-grant amendment of patent, and the interpretation and legislative suggestions of the requirements for a post-grant amendment of patent, and what should the civil court do when patentee filing a request for amending the description, claim(s) or drawing(s) of a granted patent during civil procedure, and whether a post-grant amendment of patent could be used to initiate a rehearing action to request a review of the final and binding civil judgment, and whether patentee can file a request for amending the description, claim(s) or drawing(s) of a granted patent during an administrative litigation procedure.

並列關鍵字

post-grant amendment of patent ； patent ； claim

參考文獻

1. 李素華（2016）。〈民事法院自為判斷專利有效性與加速解決紛爭之迷思-從最高法院104年度台上字第407號民事判決談起〉，《月旦裁判時報》，43期，頁31-43。

12. 賴恆盈（2011）。〈論行政訴訟之裁判基準時〉，《政大法學評論》，121期，頁223-312。

3. 吳雅貞（(2013）。〈專利新法「部分准駁原則」與「專利權人更正利益」之交錯――最高行政法院101年度判字第106號判決評析〉，《萬國法律》，187期，頁11-21。

一、 中文部分

1. 司法院行政訴訟及懲戒廳（編）（2008）。《智慧財產案件審理法新制問答彙編》。司法院。