綠地層級與文化生態系統服務關係之研究

A Study of Relationship between Green Land System and Cultural Ecosystem Services

黃奕閤(Yi-Ho Huang)

指導教授 ： 林寶秀

國立臺灣大學/生物資源暨農學院/園藝暨景觀學系/碩士(2021年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202100615

摘要

生態系統服務為人類從自然中直接或間接獲得的各種效益，包含供應、調節、支持與文化生態系統服務，其中文化生態系統服務為人類透過生態系統所獲得的非物質效益，能緩解生活壓力並促進身心健康，因此識別並量化文化生態系統服務的提供變得日益重要。綠地為提供生態系統服務的重要結構，各綠地層級提供的文化生態系統服務會因其空間屬性及層級大小而有所不同。本研究目的為瞭解綠地層級和文化生態系統服務之關係，並進行文化生態系統服務重要度及表現度分析，以瞭解文化生態系統服務在各綠地層級中認知重要度與表現度之差異情形。
研究首先統整並歸納出11項綠地層級，再根據過去文獻所提出之文化生態系統服務，對其進行定義及問項擬定，包含遊憩、知識系統、教育、文化遺產、美學、靈感啟發、象徵意義、精神信仰、娛樂、存在、贈遺、社會關係、地方感，以及文化多樣性，共計14項文化生態系統服務。研究透過網路問卷進行調查，研究結果發現不同綠地層級所提供的文化生態系統服務項目不同，且隨著綠地層級越高，其所具備的文化生態系統服務數量越多，而綠地層級與個人背景對部分文化生態系統服務的識別與認知重要度呈現顯著關係。透過重要度及表現度分析，發現整體而言文化生態系統服務的重要度顯著大於表現度，代表各綠地層級在經營管理上皆有進步的空間，而在IPA分析上發現而多數綠地層級皆重視遊憩、美學、遺贈服務，且多半表現良好，表示應持續保持維護，而存在、教育、文化遺產服務在部分綠地層級則需要優先進行改善。

關鍵字

生態系統服務 ； 文化生態系統服務 ； 綠地層級 ； 重要度 ； 表現度

並列摘要

Ecosystem services are the various benefits that humans obtain directly or indirectly from nature. These include provisioning, regulating, and cultural services. Cultural ecosystem services are non-material benefits that humans obtain through ecosystems, which can relieve pressure and promote physical and mental health. Therefore, it is important to identify and quantify the provision of cultural ecosystem services. Green space is an important structure that provides ecosystem services. The cultural ecosystem services provided by green land system are different depending on the spatial attributes and levels. The purpose of this research is to understand the relationship between green land system and cultural ecosystem services. To conduct an analysis of importance-performance analysis (IPA) of cultural ecosystem services, and understand the differences in the importance and performance of cultural ecosystem services in green land system.
The research summarizes 11 green lands, and then defines cultural ecosystem services and formulates based on the service structure proposed in the past literature, including recreation, knowledge systems, education, cultural heritage, aesthetics, inspiration, symbol, religion, entertainment, existence, bequest, social relationship, sense of place, and cultural diversity. The study adopted web surveys. The results of the study found that there are differences in cultural ecosystem services provided by green lands, and the higher green land system can provide more cultural ecosystem services. The importance of cultural ecosystem services by the green land system and personal background are both significantly different. Through IPA analysis, it is found that the importance of cultural ecosystem services is greater than performance, which means that each green land has room for improvement in operation and management. According to IPA analysis, it is found that interviewees attach importance to recreation, aesthetics, and bequest services. These cultural ecosystem services mostly performed well, and should be maintained. Existence, education, and cultural heritage services need to be prioritized for improvement at some green lands.

並列關鍵字

Ecosystem services ； Cultural ecosystem services ； Geen land system ； Importance ； Performance

參考文獻

1. 中華民國景觀學會 (2010)。公園綠地系統規劃設計手冊暨操作案例。台北市：內政部營建署。

2. 內政部營建署 (1999)。公園綠地管理及設施維護手冊。台北市：內政部營建署。

3. 王小璘、何友鋒 (1999)。公園綠地規劃設計準則研究。台北市：內政部營建署。

4. 王秀娟、王希智 (2000)。 都市地區公園綠地基礎調查與系統建立之研究-以台北市士林地區為例。環境與藝術學刊1，51-70。

5. 王麗娟、 謝文豐 (2000)。生態保育。台北市：揚智文化。