收養,是我國文化中自古即有的制度。但是這個舊有的制度,在過去和現在,因為人權的伸張、價值觀的轉變,有不同理解。 兩岸之間經過60多年的分離,兩岸收養,會有何種問題存在,是本論文要討論的重點。這重點的研究,來自對於收養法規的熟稔及涉陸收養實務的經驗。本論文透過涉陸收養實務的檢討,檢視我國現有的收養法律和大陸地區的規定,是否能夠滿足兩岸收養人、被收養人的最佳利益,尤其是被收養的大陸地區未成年子女。這也是本論文的副標題∼以臺灣地區人民收養大陸地區未成年人為例。 筆者很幸運的,能夠親身參與法院收養實務工作。因此,對於涉陸收養實務的體會,能夠比一般未接觸涉陸收養事務的先進更為深刻。也因為親身參與收養實務,能有機會接觸最多的收養資訊,這對於本論文的醞釀及熟成有非常大的幫助。 本論文採:一、文獻研究,透過各種不同的文獻資料,全面性的瞭解專家、學者對於本文研究核心事項的意見及看法。二、實證研究,依據現有的法規,對照法院實務上的操作方法及結論,以實證的方式,檢討出現有法規的不足與瑕疵,所造成實務應用上的困難,找出法規、實務調整的可能性及方向。三、個案研究,本文將逐一檢討各個案中法院的結論適法或不適法的原因,並藉由觀察各個案的適用法則,以累積的資料判斷實務的共通或大部分結論及立場,做為本文的研究核心。四、功能分析,藉由對我國目前收養法制的分析,瞭解在涉陸收養法制的設計及實際的功能上,如何造成涉陸收養實務上的困境以及法制間的衝突。最後並總結上開各研究分析方法之結果,就法院涉陸收養實務的困境、行政機關的解釋困境等等,提出將來法院面臨涉陸收養事件時,所可採取的法律解釋方法及法律修正意見,做為本論文的結尾。 關係詞:收養;兩岸;法院收養實務工作;實務應用上的困難;實務的困境;收養法制間的衝突。
Adoption,is our existing system,But we have different comment in the past and present by the Changes of the values and human rights, After sixty years of separation between the two sides,What is the problem of adoption between the two sides is the point of this paper,the point of study is come from the familiar with adoption laws and the Practical experience,Through practical discussion View the provisions of existing laws and the mainland areas of adoption, may the adoptee's interests able to meet the people on both sides of adoption.Especially in mainland China adopted minor child,The subtitle ofthis thesis∼The example of People in Taiwan adoption mainland minors. I’m so Lucky and honored,Able to personally participate in the substantive work of the Court of adoption,therefore,Continental adoption practices for understanding, Can be more profound of in contact with advanced adoptions involving land matters,Because personally involved in adoption practice, to have access toup to adoption in formation,It’s helpful for the thesis of brewing and ripening. In this paper:Study of Literature, through various literature, Comprehensive understanding of experts and scholars studied the core issues opinions and views.An Empirical Study,According to existing regulations:the way of oprationon the court and conclusions,according to empirical and discussing the inadequacies and flaws of law and cause difficulties on the practical application and to ldentify the possibilities and directions of regulations, practices adjustment,Case study:The paper will review the reasons for the Court's conclusion in each case applicable law or discomfort law,and by observing the applicable laws of each case then cumulative data to determine common or most practical conclusions and positions,it’s the core of this paper studies.Functional Analysis:By analysis of our current legal adoption,Understanding the legal adoption of land-related design and practical function,How to create conflicts and legal difficulties involved in adoption.Finally,summarize the results of the method of analysis,On the plight of the Court of adoption practices involving land,Explain the plight of administrative units,Court faced adoption events involving land,Legal interpretation that can be taken and legal amendments,As at the end of this paper. Key Word: Adoption;two sides;the substantive work of the Court of adoption; difficulties on the practical application;legal difficulties involved in adoption.